Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
Published on: May 31, 2011
Abstract:
In adopting, implementing, and enforcing regulation, various costs are incurred that typically are not included in benefit-cost analyses. These costs include private and public administrative costs, political activity costs, and growth costs. We estimate these indirect costs to be from 20 to 38 percent of the direct costs of complying with regulations. For pollution control regulations, the range is 22-29 percent. Analysis of 20 Inflation Impact Statements indicates that in all cases the regulating agency neglects these indirect costs. This neglect can lead ceterus paribus to overlie stringent regulations and to adoption of regulations with negative net benefits.
More Related Videos
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Drug Regulation
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Self-Regulation