Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combining clinical budgets and DRGs for quality management.

I Wickings

    Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
    |March 11, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary

    Global and clinical budgets control healthcare costs effectively but neglect quality. Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) can link costs to outcomes and quality, guiding price adjustments without compromising care standards.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Review of clinical budgeting and costing experiments.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same author

    Comparative hospital databases: value for management and quality.

    Quality in health care : QHC·1994
    Same author

    Proof of the pudding. CASPE's patient satisfaction system.

    The Health service journal·1989
    Same author

    Information from patients as a management tool--empowering managers to improve the quality of care.

    The Hospital and health services review·1988
    Same author

    Payment by diagnosis.

    Lancet (London, England)·1984
    Same author

    Is there a general theory for health care budgeting?

    Effective health care·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Health economics
    • Healthcare management
    • Quality improvement

    Background:

    • Global and clinical budgets are increasingly used in the UK and globally to manage healthcare expenditures.
    • While effective for cost control, these budgets often fail to adequately incorporate measures of patient outcomes and quality of care.
    • Existing cost-containment strategies may inadvertently impact the standard of healthcare services provided.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the potential of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) as a tool for integrating cost management with quality and outcome assessment in healthcare.
    • To evaluate how DRG categorization can inform health system managers about cost-saving opportunities without compromising quality.
    • To identify the utility of DRGs in monitoring potential negative impacts on patient outcomes resulting from price reductions.

    Main Methods:

    • The study conceptually examines the application of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) within healthcare financial management frameworks.
    • It analyzes the potential of DRG-based categorization to correlate treatment costs with measurable outcomes and quality indicators.
    • The research discusses the strategic use of DRGs for informed decision-making by health system managers.

    Main Results:

    • Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) offer a viable mechanism for associating healthcare costs with quality and outcome metrics.
    • Carefully constructed DRG systems can empower managers to identify areas for cost reduction that do not adversely affect quality standards.
    • DRGs can serve as an early warning system, highlighting potential declines in patient outcomes linked to cost-cutting measures.

    Conclusions:

    • DRGs can enhance traditional cost-control budgeting by incorporating quality and outcome considerations.
    • Implementing DRG-based analysis allows for more nuanced financial management in healthcare, balancing cost-efficiency with patient well-being.
    • Strategic use of DRGs is crucial for sustainable healthcare systems that prioritize both economic viability and high-quality patient care.

    Related Experiment Videos