National health insurance reconsidered: dilemmas and opportunities

Changing social and economic constraints are precipitating a reformulation of the role of government in the provision of social welfare services. The authors conclude that government intervention in the health sector is bound to expand rather than contract because centralization is the key to reconciling otherwise divergent political demands for spending controls and greater equality of access to quality care for the increasing number of uninsured or underinsured persons. In the past eight years, the federal government has unleashed competitive market principles that have had negative side effects on the nation's health services. Payers, providers, and consumers will likely seek to protect themselves by forming coalitions, as happened recently in Massachusetts where the law now requires employers to provide minimum health insurance benefits to their employees. Escalating pressures to correct the damages from short-term piecemeal solutions to problems of health finance and delivery will provide the chief dynamic for universal health insurance in the United States. New economic, social, and political realities suggest, however, an eclectic strategy for attaining this goal that bears little resemblance to the conventional wisdom that guided health policy throughout the postwar period.