Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recertification. Panel discussion.

D T Vetrosky, J J Heinrich, P C Hendrix

    Physician Assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)
    |December 11, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Search for Magnetic Monopole Pair Production in Ultraperipheral Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.36  TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same journal

    The emerging infectious diseases.

    Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)·1995
    Same journal

    The lonely road. Primary care providers coping with AIDS.

    Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)·1995
    Same journal

    Implementing a smoking cessation program for your patients.

    Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)·1995
    Same journal

    Individual rights and public health. Physician Assistant forum.

    Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)·1995
    Same journal

    Increasing PAs' awareness and understanding of self-help groups. An educational model.

    Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)·1995
    Same journal

    Nutrition, immunity, and HIV disease.

    Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)·1995
    See all related articles

    The current Physician Assistant (PA) recertification process is under review. Leaders are debating existing methods and exploring potential changes to ensure continued competency for PAs.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development

    Background:

    • The recertification process for Physician Assistants (PAs) is a critical component of maintaining professional standards and ensuring patient safety.
    • Ongoing evaluation of recertification is essential to adapt to evolving healthcare landscapes and clinical practices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically examine the current Physician Assistant (PA) recertification procedures.
    • To explore and discuss potential modifications and alternative approaches to PA recertification.

    Main Methods:

    • A candid debate between key leaders in the Physician Assistant profession, including the chairperson of the ad hoc committee on recertification and the AAPA's executive vice president.
    • Discussion of proposed changes with members of the Physician Assistant editorial board and other profession leaders.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Identification of areas for improvement within the existing PA recertification framework.
    • Exploration of various options for future recertification, reflecting diverse perspectives within the profession.

    Conclusions:

    • The current Physician Assistant (PA) recertification process requires careful consideration and potential adaptation.
    • Collaborative dialogue among PA leaders is crucial for developing effective and relevant recertification strategies.