Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control in the pulmonary function laboratory.

J L Hankinson

    Respiratory Care
    |June 10, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Computers enhance pulmonary function testing quality control by enforcing standards and reducing errors. However, vigilance is needed against hardware/software failures and data loss risks.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Changes in the FEV₁/FVC ratio during childhood and adolescence: an intercontinental study.

    The European respiratory journal·2010
    Same author

    Age- and size-related reference ranges: a case study of spirometry through childhood and adulthood.

    Statistics in medicine·2008
    Same author

    Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstruction.

    Thorax·2008
    Same author

    Beyond the peak flow meter: newer technologies for determining and documenting changes in lung function in the workplace.

    Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2000
    Same author

    Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.

    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2000
    Same author

    Office spirometry: does poor quality render it impractical?

    Chest·1999
    Same journal

    Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Comparative Evaluation of Risk Scores for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications".

    Respiratory care·2026
    Same journal

    Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Stable COPD: A Multimodal Assessment of Diaphragmatic and Cough-Related Impairment.

    Respiratory care·2026
    Same journal

    Flow Asynchronies During Pressure Support Ventilation in Children: A Bench Model Study.

    Respiratory care·2026
    Same journal

    Inspiratory Effort Assessment Using the Occlusion Pressure-Derived Tension-Time Index.

    Respiratory care·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical Usage of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Across Disease Categories and Care Settings: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

    Respiratory care·2026
    Same journal

    Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Devices as Analyzed in Lung Models: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Peak Expiratory Flow Data.

    Respiratory care·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Pulmonary Medicine
    • Medical Laboratory Science
    • Health Informatics

    Background:

    • Pulmonary function laboratories traditionally faced quality-control challenges.
    • Manual measurements and calculations were prone to human error and inefficiency.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of computer integration on quality control in pulmonary function laboratories.
    • To identify benefits and drawbacks of computer-assisted quality control.

    Main Methods:

    • Implementing computer programs to enforce testing standards and perform self-diagnostics.
    • Utilizing computers for calibration checks, reference value verification, and internal consistency checks.
    • Comparing computer-assisted quality control with traditional manual methods.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Computers significantly reduce manual errors and improve laboratory efficiency.
    • Automated quality control allows for more frequent processing of control samples.
    • Potential risks include undetected computer hardware/software failures and data loss from single digital storage.

    Conclusions:

    • Computerization enhances pulmonary function laboratory quality control by standardizing procedures and minimizing human error.
    • Effective quality control requires ongoing evaluation of software, hardware, and data management strategies.
    • Recommendations include ensuring software compliance, routine calibration, data consistency checks, and redundant data storage.