Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Randomized clinical trials in surgery.

B McPeek, F Mosteller, M McKneally

    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
    |December 10, 1988
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The distribution of sums of rounded percentages.

    Demography·2011
    Same author

    Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects.

    Statistics in medicine·1998
    Same author

    Thoracoscopic management of chylous fistulae.

    American journal of otolaryngology·1998
    Same author

    The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials.

    Anesthesia and analgesia·1998
    Same author

    Comparative efficacy of epidural, subarachnoid, and intracerebroventricular opioids in patients with pain due to cancer.

    Regional anesthesia·1996
    Same author

    Uncertainty of the time of first significance in random effects cumulative meta-analysis.

    Controlled clinical trials·1996
    Same journal

    Measuring, Valuing, and Incorporating Patient and Caregiver Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations: A Scoping Review and Environmental Scan.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    ASSESSING COST EFFECTIVENESS IN ONCOLOGY TREATMENT SEQUENCES: A REVIEW OF PATHWAY MODELLING METHODS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    Practice and challenges of HB-HTA in China: insights from hospital management and clinical perspectives.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    Policy Dialogue on Health Technology Assessment in Middle East and North Africa: Reporting from an HTAi initiative.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    What is new in the early health technology assessment's new definition?

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    Same journal

    Incorporating climate impact in health care decisions: new criteria to be tested in the Netherlands.

    International journal of technology assessment in health care·2026
    See all related articles

    Randomized clinical trials offer robust evidence for intervention effectiveness. This article details methods to strengthen trial design, execution, and analysis, ensuring reliable causal inference in research.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Trials Methodology
    • Evidence-Based Medicine
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating comparative intervention effectiveness.
    • Significant advancements have been made in RCT design, execution, analysis, and reporting over recent decades.
    • Ensuring the validity of RCTs requires rigorous methods to exclude confounding factors and establish causal links.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss critical considerations for conducting high-quality randomized clinical trials.
    • To highlight strategies for strengthening the internal and external validity of clinical trials.
    • To provide guidance on optimizing the design, conduct, and feasibility of clinical trials.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of key issues in RCTs, including generalizability and potential pitfalls.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of methods to enhance trial rigor, such as power and sample size calculations.
  • Consideration of the relationship between study design, reported outcomes, and the decision to initiate a trial.

    • Main Results:

    • Well-conducted RCTs provide the strongest evidence for treatment effectiveness.
    • Attention to design, execution, and analysis is crucial for valid causal inference.
    • Various strategies exist to improve the feasibility and reliability of clinical trials.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimizing RCT design and execution is essential for generating reliable evidence.
    • Addressing issues of generalizability, power, and feasibility enhances the impact of clinical trials.
    • Collaborative efforts and careful planning can improve the overall quality and utility of clinical trial research.