Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control for chest radiography.

J Lowthian, B McFadden

    The Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology
    |September 6, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Implementing a quality control program significantly improved chest radiography image quality. This standardized approach in a radiology department led to better diagnostic accuracy and maintained standards effectively.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Vaccinia-based oncolytic immunotherapy Pexastimogene Devacirepvec in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: a randomized multicenter Phase IIb trial (TRAVERSE).

    Oncoimmunology·2019
    Same author

    Major trauma in older persons.

    BJS open·2018
    Same author

    Emergency demand and repeat attendances by older patients.

    Internal medicine journal·2013
    Same author

    HCFA support may affect all APNs.

    Neonatal network : NN·1998
    Same author

    Influencing our growth: a tribute to two doctors.

    Neonatal network : NN·1996
    Same author

    In vitro replication of cyanobacterial plasmids from Synechocystis PCC 6803.

    Plasmid·1994
    Same journal

    CAMRT members accept degree requirement for entry to practice. Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists.

    The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology·1995
    Same journal

    A framework to develop a sexual abuse prevention program.

    The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology·1995
    Same journal

    The challenges and opportunities of multiskilling in health care. Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists.

    The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology·1995
    Same journal

    Sexual harassment in health care: implications for medical radiation technology training programs.

    The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology·1995
    Same journal

    Competency-Based Certification Project. Phase III: content validity, standard setting and criterion-related validity.

    The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology·1995
    Same journal

    Competency-Based Certification Project. Phase II: Examination blueprint.

    The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology·1994
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Quality Improvement

    Background:

    • Chest radiography is a common diagnostic imaging procedure.
    • Maintaining high image quality is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
    • Variability in image quality can impact clinical decisions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To establish and evaluate a quality control program for chest radiography.
    • To standardize image acquisition techniques and acceptance criteria.
    • To assess the impact of the program on overall film quality.

    Main Methods:

    • A multidisciplinary "Chest Team" was formed, dividing technologists into Standard, Consistency, and Monitoring groups.
    • Educational sessions defined "good" chest film characteristics and quality factors.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Inter-group controls were used to standardize methods and criteria.
  • Random inspections of chest radiographs were conducted before and after implementation.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant improvement in the overall quality of chest films was observed over a three-month period.
    • Standardization of techniques and acceptance criteria was achieved.
    • The established quality standards were maintained with minimal ongoing effort.

    Conclusions:

    • A structured quality control program effectively enhances chest radiography quality.
    • Standardization and team-based quality assurance are key to consistent, high-quality imaging.
    • The program demonstrated sustained improvement and maintainability.