Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk: a media perspective.

R Edwards1

  • 1robedwards1@compuserve.com

Journal of Radiological Protection : Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection
|May 13, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Journalists and media business needs create challenges for radiation protection professionals. Public perception of radiation risks is influenced by a lack of control and scientific uncertainty surrounding low-level radiation effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neutron-Multiplicity Measurement in Muon Capture on Oxygen Nuclei in the Gadolinium-Loaded Super-Kamiokande Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

The role of human thermoregulation in thermal discomfort in lower-limb prosthetics: A scoping review.

Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal·2025
Same author

Computer-aided analysis of high-dimensional Glass networks: Periodicity, chaos, and bifurcations in a ring circuit.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

First Joint Oscillation Analysis of Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric and T2K Accelerator Neutrino Data.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Periodic Time Variations of the Solar ^{8}B Neutrino Flux between 1996 and 2018 in Super-Kamiokande.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Is Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion Prognostic for Clinical Outcomes in Type II Endometrial Cancer?

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022
Same journal

Dose Simulation for the MATROSHKA-R Experiment onboard the International Space Station Using a High-Fidelity Model of the Zvezda Module.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

Reflecting Local Economic Parameters in ALARA Evaluations for the Reuse of Decommissioning Remaining Building.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

OBITUARYRoger Clarke 1943-2026.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

Radiation protection knowledge among healthcare professionals and students - what (if anything) are studies telling us?

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

Impact of the ICRU/ICRP proposal on operational quantities during interventional procedures: Investigation through spectral measurements.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same journal

The Declaration of Adelaide White paper: Guidelines for Author Responsibility in Peer Review.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Public Health
  • Nuclear Science

Background:

  • Media coverage often focuses on radiation accidents, neglecting routine operations, which impacts public perception.
  • Historical secrecy within the nuclear industry, stemming from atomic bomb development, continues to affect public discourse and trust.
  • Emerging research on genomic instability introduces scientific uncertainty regarding the effects of low-level radiation exposure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the challenges faced by radiation protection professionals due to media practices and industry secrecy.
  • To explore the scientific uncertainties surrounding low-level radiation and their impact on public risk perception.
  • To understand the public's aversion to artificial radioactivity and the role of perceived control.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of media reporting trends concerning radiation issues.
  • Review of scientific literature on low-level radiation effects and genomic instability.
  • Examination of psychological factors influencing risk perception, particularly the role of control.

Main Results:

  • Media's focus on sensationalism over routine operations creates a skewed public understanding of radiation risks.
  • Secrecy and dishonesty in past radiation incidents have eroded public trust.
  • Scientific discoveries regarding genomic instability highlight uncertainties in understanding low-level radiation impacts.
  • Public distrust of artificial radioactivity is linked to a perceived lack of control over exposure sources like nuclear tests and accidents.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing public concerns about radiation requires transparency and honest communication from the nuclear industry and media.
  • Rebuilding trust necessitates acknowledging scientific uncertainties and the public's psychological response to uncontrollable risks.
  • Effective radiation protection strategies must integrate public perception and communication alongside scientific data.