Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Fetal Mouse Cardiovascular Imaging Using a High-frequency Ultrasound (30/45MHZ) System
Published on: May 5, 2018
A local congenital anomalies register: monitoring preventive interventions
I D Richards1, H B Bentley, A M Glenny
1Academic Unit of Public Health Medicine, University of Leeds.
Insights
A congenital anomalies register effectively tracks interventions and prenatal diagnoses. Including termination data improves monitoring of preventive measures for birth defects.
Area of Science:
- Medical Science
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- High-quality data on congenital anomalies is crucial for monitoring primary prevention interventions.
- Accurate data is needed for prenatal diagnosis and informed decisions regarding pregnancy termination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish and evaluate a local congenital anomalies register.
- To assess the incidence of congenital anomalies and their impact on pregnancy outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Compiled a register of congenital anomalies from births and terminations over 18 months.
- Utilized multiple ascertainment sources to capture a comprehensive range of structural anomalies.
Main Results:
- The total incidence of anomalies (excluding spontaneous abortions) was 1.31%.
- 31.3% of known anomalies resulted in termination, and 2.26% of legal abortions were for congenital anomalies.
- The overall birth prevalence rate was 1.10%.
Conclusions:
- A local congenital anomalies register is valuable for monitoring preventive measure effectiveness.
- Registers should encompass data on legal terminations alongside birth and subsequent diagnoses.
Background:
There is need for good quality data on congenital anomalies for monitoring (1) interventions for primary prevention and (2) prenatal diagnosis with advice on termination of affected pregnancies.
Method:
A register was compiled of congenital anomalies arising among births to Leeds residents in an 18 month period (13,596) and terminations (3015) in a related pregnancy cohort. Multiple sources of ascertainment were used and the full range of structural anomalies was included.
Results:
The total incidence of anomalies (excluding spontaneous abortions) was 1.31 per cent. Incidence rates for the major categories are reported and compared with birth prevalence rates from British studies in the 1950-1960s. It was found that 31.3 per cent of the known anomalies were aborted; 2.26 per cent of the legal abortions were for a congenital anomaly. The overall birth prevalence rate was 1.10 per cent. Neural tube defects are used as an example of the use of a local congenital anomalies register in auditing preventive measures.
Conclusion:
A local congenital anomalies register is a valuable instrument in monitoring the impact of preventive measures, but it should include data on legal terminations as well as cases detected at birth and subsequently.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:30Preventive Healthcare Services
01:07Teratogenicity