Related Experiment Videos

Capillary refill and core-peripheral temperature gap as indicators of haemodynamic status in paediatric intensive

S M Tibby1, M Hatherill, I A Murdoch

  • 1Department of Paediatric Intensive Care, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

Insights

Capillary refill time (CRT) weakly correlates with hemodynamic parameters in general pediatric intensive care patients. A normal CRT of ≤2 seconds may not reliably predict outcomes in this population, especially those with septic shock.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric critical care medicine
  • Hemodynamics
  • Shock management

Background:

  • Capillary refill time (CRT) is a clinical indicator used in assessing shock.
  • Its utility in the postresuscitation phase in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) requires further evaluation.
  • Core-peripheral temperature gap is also considered for circulatory assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the relationship between CRT and hemodynamic parameters in postresuscitation PICU patients.
  • To compare CRT with the core-peripheral temperature gap in this cohort.
  • To evaluate the predictive value of a normal CRT for patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Ninety standardized CRT measurements were performed on 55 pediatric patients (27 postcardiac surgery, 28 general, including 24 with septic shock).
  • Hemodynamic variables measured included cardiac index, central venous pressure, systemic vascular resistance index, stroke volume index (SVI), and blood lactate.
  • Seventy measurements were taken during inotropic or vasodilator therapy.

Main Results:

  • CRT and temperature gap showed poor correlation with hemodynamic variables in postcardiac surgery patients.
  • In general ICU patients, CRT correlated with SVI and lactate; temperature gap correlated poorly.
  • Prolonged CRT (> or = 6 seconds) best predicted reduced SVI in general ICU patients.

Conclusions:

  • In ventilated general ICU patients, CRT has a weak association with blood lactate and SVI.
  • A normal CRT value of ≤2 seconds has limited predictive value and may be too conservative for this patient group, particularly those with septic shock.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos