Related Experiment Videos
Should GPs have direct access to imaging for children with urinary tract infections? An observational study
A F Polmear1, I J Kenney, S A Barnard
1Academic Unit of Primary Care, Trafford Centre for Medical Education and Research, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Insights
Direct referral by general practitioners for pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) imaging is effective. This approach reduces delays and saves outpatient appointments without increasing referrals, challenging traditional specialist referral recommendations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- General Practice
Background:
- Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children necessitate urinary tract imaging.
- Current guidelines recommend specialist referral before imaging for pediatric UTIs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of direct general practitioner (GP) referral for pediatric UTI imaging versus traditional specialist referral.
- To identify potential advantages of direct GP referral in managing pediatric UTIs.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 200 children diagnosed with UTIs.
- 100 children were referred directly for imaging by GPs under a protocol.
- 100 children were referred to pediatric specialists before imaging.
Main Results:
- Direct GP referral led to shorter imaging delays.
- No inappropriate referrals were identified through urinalysis or imaging yield.
- Consistent follow-up arrangements and significant savings in outpatient department (OPD) appointments were observed.
- The total number of imaging referrals did not increase.
Conclusions:
- Agreed protocols support direct GP referral for pediatric UTI imaging.
- Current recommendations against direct GP referral without specialist consultation are not supported by evidence.
- Direct referral streamlines care and resource utilization for pediatric UTIs.
Background:
All children with urinary tract infections (UTIs) should undergo imaging of the urinary tract. The Royal College of Radiologists currently recommends that such children should be referred to a paediatric specialist prior to imaging.
Aim:
To investigate whether direct referral of such children by general practitioners (GPs) for imaging offers advantages over the traditional approach.
Method:
Information on 100 children with UTIs, who were referred direct for imaging by GPs according to an agreed protocol, was compared with information on 100 children with UTIs referred initially to paediatric specialists.
Results:
Protocol-guided direct referral resulted in less delay prior to imaging, no evidence of inappropriate referral (as judged by urinalysis and yield from imaging), greater consistency of follow-up arrangements, and a considerable saving in outpatient department (OPD) appointments. There was no increase in the overall number of referrals for imaging.
Conclusion:
Given agreed protocols, there is no basis for current recommendations that GPs should not refer children with UTIs for imaging without a prior paediatric opinion.