Related Experiment Videos
A simple method for estimating the intensity of purifying selection in protein-coding genes
1Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Molecular Biology and Evolution
|May 20, 1999
Summary
We developed a new method to estimate purifying selection intensity using processed pseudogenes and homologous genes. This approach reveals significant selective constraint on synonymous mutations, with no major differences between humans and murids.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Molecular Evolution
- Genetics
Background:
- Estimating the intensity of purifying selection is crucial for understanding molecular evolution.
- Previous methods often struggle to disentangle the effects of mutation rate from selective pressures.
- Processed pseudogenes offer a unique window into neutral mutation accumulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and validate a novel method for quantifying purifying selection intensity.
- To compare purifying selection across different codon positions and between species (humans and murids).
- To investigate the role of purifying selection in driving evolutionary rate differences.
Main Methods:
- Utilized three aligned homologous sequences: a processed pseudogene (psi), a functional paralog (g), and a functional ortholog (o).
- Calculated nucleotide substitution rates (K psi and K(g)) along pseudogene and functional gene branches.
- Derived the fraction of neutral mutations (fg) as K(g)/K psi, with 1-fg representing purifying selection intensity.
Main Results:
- The K(g)/K psi ratio effectively estimates purifying selection intensity, separating it from mutation rate effects.
- Purifying selection is strongest at the second codon position and weakest at the third.
- A substantial fraction of third codon positions (synonymous sites) are under selective constraint (41-42% neutral).
- Significant variation in selection intensity was observed between orthologous genes in humans and murids.
- No statistically significant overall difference in purifying selection intensity was found between humans and murids.
Conclusions:
- The proposed method accurately estimates purifying selection intensity.
- Synonymous mutations are under considerable selective constraint, challenging the notion of complete neutrality.
- Purifying selection does not appear to be a major driver of evolutionary rate differences between humans and murids.