Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-effective preoperative evaluation and testing.

S P Fischer1

  • 1Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Hospital, CA 94305, USA. fischer_s@hosp.stanford.edu

Chest
|May 20, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The preoperative assessment of the cancer patient.

Current opinion in anaesthesiology·2006
Same author

General anesthesia in a patient on long-term amphetamine therapy: is there cause for concern?

Anesthesia and analgesia·2000
Same author

Tissue fixation security in transosseous rotator cuff repairs: a mechanical comparison of simple versus mattress sutures.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association·1996
Same author

Development and effectiveness of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic in a teaching hospital.

Anesthesiology·1996
Same author

Ketorolac and propofol anesthesia in a patient taking chronic monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·1996
Same author

Preoperative evaluation of the adult neurosurgical patient.

International anesthesiology clinics·1996
Same journal

The effect of a two-day stay at high altitude (2500 m) on right ventricular afterload and oxygen delivery in patients with pulmonary vascular disease A randomized controlled crossover trial.

Chest·2026
Same journal

A Comparative Study of Radiation Exposure in Conventional and Robotic Bronchoscopy.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Independent Prognostic Contributions of Anti-Ro52 and Anti-MDA5 in Autoimmune-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Lung aeration and gas exchange in SGA or AGA infants with moderate-severe BPD: secondary analysis of the PATH-BPD study.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality after Negative Low-Dose CT Screening Results.

Chest·2026
Same journal

Symptom prevalence and impact on lung cancer risk in the SUMMIT study.

Chest·2026
See all related articles

Implementing cost-effective preoperative evaluations involves organizational and clinical changes. These strategies improve patient care and benefit healthcare professionals and administrators.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Practice Management
  • Healthcare Economics

Background:

  • Preoperative evaluation is crucial for patient safety and surgical outcomes.
  • Current preoperative processes can be resource-intensive and present opportunities for cost-effectiveness improvements.
  • Integrating data and educational strategies can optimize preoperative care pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose organizational and clinical modifications to the preoperative evaluation process.
  • To analyze the cost-effective outcomes associated with these proposed changes.
  • To evaluate the benefits of these changes for physicians, operating room nurses, and center administrators.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current preoperative evaluation methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposal of specific organizational and clinical process changes.
  • Analysis of potential cost-effectiveness and impact on healthcare personnel.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key areas for implementing cost-saving measures in preoperative assessments.
    • Demonstrated potential for improved efficiency and resource allocation.
    • Highlighted benefits including enhanced physician workflow and streamlined nursing processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Proposed changes offer a viable strategy for cost-effective preoperative evaluations.
    • Implementation can lead to significant financial benefits and operational improvements.
    • Optimized preoperative processes positively impact all stakeholders involved in surgical care.