Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Loudness scaling revisited.

C Elberling1

  • 1OTICON Research Centre, Eriksholm, Snekkersten, Denmark.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|May 20, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Categorical loudness scaling shows significant between-subject variance, making it unreliable for nonlinear hearing aid fitting. While loudness function slopes correlate with hearing loss, this method generally offers limited practical information for device adjustment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discussion of Signal-processing Potentials; Cochlear Implants.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
Same author

Discussion of Signal-processing Potentials; Acoustic Hearing Aids.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
Same author

Non-linear signal processing in digital hearing aids.

Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum·1999
Same author

A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.

Ear and hearing·1997
Same author

A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.

Ear and hearing·1997
Same author

A digital filterbank hearing aid. Improving a prescriptive fitting with subjective adjustments.

Scandinavian audiology·1997
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Audiology and Hearing Science
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Nonlinear hearing aid fitting aims to optimize audibility for individuals with hearing loss.
  • Categorical loudness scaling is a psychoacoustic technique used to assess sound perception.
  • The utility of categorical loudness scaling for clinical hearing aid fitting remains under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of categorical loudness scaling in providing data for nonlinear hearing aid fitting.
  • To analyze the relationship between loudness perception categories and sound levels in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
  • To determine if loudness scaling data can predict necessary hearing aid adjustments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of normative data from seven categorical loudness scaling procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of hearing-impaired listener data from four separate studies.
  • Statistical assessment of loudness function slopes and their variance in relation to hearing loss.

    • Main Results:

    • Individual loudness scaling procedures exhibit differing relationships between perceptual categories and sound levels, with high between-subject variability.
    • The inverse slope of the loudness function in hearing-impaired individuals shows a linear correlation with the degree of hearing loss.
    • The slope can often be predicted from hearing loss with accuracy comparable to fine-tuning adjustments.

    Conclusions:

    • Categorical loudness scaling, due to its inherent variability, is generally not a significant source of information for hearing aid fitting.
    • Both normal and impaired loudness function characteristics are crucial for effective nonlinear hearing aid fitting.
    • Further research may be needed to explore alternative or complementary methods for optimizing hearing aid settings.