Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two phase effects in roughness perception.

D Pressnitzer1, S McAdams

  • 1Institut de Recherche et de Coordination Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM), Paris, France.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|May 21, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Auditory Perception: Laurel and Yanny Together at Last.

Current biology : CB·2018
Same author

Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2017
Same author

A Neural Substrate for Rapid Timbre Recognition? Neural and Behavioral Discrimination of Very Brief Acoustic Vowels.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2015
Same author

Adaptive coding is constrained to midline locations in a spatial listening task.

Journal of neurophysiology·2012
Same author

Reliability of environmental sampling to quantify Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis on California free-stall dairies.

Journal of dairy science·2009
Same author

Neural correlates of timbre change in harmonic sounds.

NeuroImage·2002
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Sound roughness perception depends on both spectral and temporal factors. Phase manipulation influences roughness, indicating temporal asymmetry plays a role beyond modulation depth in auditory processing.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Roughness is a key auditory percept influenced by sound characteristics.
  • Previous research has focused on spectral content and modulation depth.
  • The interplay between spectral and temporal features in roughness perception requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct contributions of spectral and temporal aspects of sound to roughness perception.
  • To examine the role of phase manipulation and waveform envelope shape in perceived roughness.
  • To elucidate the underlying mechanisms of auditory processing in roughness perception.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized three-component signals with controlled phase manipulations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varied the phase of the central spectral component to alter temporal characteristics.
  • Assessed perceived roughness across different amplitude spectra and modulation depths.
  • Main Results:

    • Perceived roughness was modified by phase manipulation, even when the waveform envelope was unaffected.
    • Waveform envelope shape, independent of amplitude spectrum and modulation depth, also influenced roughness perception.
    • These findings suggest that auditory processing involves an internal representation sensitive to temporal asymmetry.

    Conclusions:

    • Roughness perception is not solely determined by the modulation depth of an internal representation.
    • Temporal asymmetry, alongside spectral content, significantly impacts the perception of sound roughness.
    • Peripheral auditory processing plays a crucial role in encoding temporal features relevant to roughness.