Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating assessment: the missing link?

S L Fowell1, L J Southgate, J G Bligh

  • 1Department of Health Care Education, The University of Liverpool, 3rd Floor, University Clinical Department, Duncan Building, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK.

Medical Education
|May 21, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating the minimum number of judges required for test-centred standard setting on written assessments. do discussion and iteration have an influence?

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2006
Same author

Assessing the technical skills of surgical trainees.

The British journal of surgery·2005
Same author

How international is Medical Education?

Medical education·2004
Same author

Student assessment in undergraduate medical education in the United Kingdom, 1998.

Medical education·2000
Same author

The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in medical undergraduate education.

Medical education·1999
Same author

Problem-based learning: a coat of many colours.

Medical education·1999
Same journal

Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

Examiner training and calibration for simulated clinical examinations: A scoping review.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

When systems set the limits of supervision.

Medical education·2026
Same journal

From psychometrics to partnerships: Broadening what counts as validity evidence.

Medical education·2026
See all related articles

Effective curriculum development requires strategic assessment. A four-stage cycle, emphasizing policy, planning, feedback, and evaluation, ensures assessments align with learning outcomes and student experiences.

Area of Science:

  • Educational assessment
  • Curriculum development
  • Learning outcomes

Background:

  • Assessment methods are integral to learning processes.
  • Effective curriculum development hinges on appropriate assessment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a comprehensive four-stage assessment cycle.
  • To detail critical components of each assessment stage.

Main Methods:

  • Describing a four-stage assessment cycle.
  • Detailing key aspects: policy, planning (blueprints), feedback, and process evaluation.
  • Elaborating on a four-level evaluation of the assessment process.

Main Results:

  • The assessment cycle includes policy, planning, feedback, and evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation involves question analysis, validity/reliability, external review, and longitudinal assessment.
  • Long-term evaluation ensures congruence between assessments and curriculum, especially in student-centered learning.

    • Conclusions:

    • A structured assessment cycle is crucial for effective curriculum development.
    • Continuous evaluation, from individual questions to long-term congruence, enhances assessment quality.
    • Aligning assessments with student-centered learning outcomes is vital for educational programs.