Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pressure-flow studies: short-time repeatability.

F Hansen1, L Olsen, A Atan

  • 1Department of Urology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. effendi@dadlnet.dk

Neurourology and Urodynamics
|May 25, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making waves: Extracting more insights from anaerobic batch tests - a modeling perspective on production rates.

Water research·2025
Same author

Comparison of FGF-8, FGF-10, FGF-Receptor 2, Androgen Receptor, Estrogen Receptor-A and SS in Healthy and Hypospadiac Children.

Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG·2024
Same author

Clinical segmentation in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: Cognitive impairments and additional genetic load.

Journal of psychiatric research·2024
Same author

Enacting Treaty Rights through Restoring Shoshone Ancestral Foods on the Wind River Indian Reservation.

Journal of poverty·2022
Same author

What are the factors affecting glanular dehiscence after hypospadias surgery?

Actas urologicas espanolas·2021
Same author

UK B.1.1.7 variant exhibits increased respiratory replication and shedding in nonhuman primates.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2021

Repeated pressure-flow studies show physiological changes, leading to less obstruction on the second voiding. Most patients maintain their bladder outlet obstruction classification upon retesting.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) diagnosis relies on pressure-flow studies.
  • Understanding test-retest variability is crucial for accurate BOO assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the within- and between-examination variation in pressure-flow study parameters.
  • To evaluate systematic changes and classification reproducibility in repeated pressure-flow studies.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 22 patients undergoing two pressure-flow tests within a month.
  • Classification of BOO using the Abrams-Griffiths nomogram (obstructed, equivocal, unobstructed).
  • Analysis of variations in detrusor pressure at maximum flow (P(det.Qmax)), bladder pressure at closure (P(det.Close)), and maximum flow rate (Qmax).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A systematic variation in P(det.Qmax) was observed, suggesting a physiological effect of repeated testing.
  • Patients shifting classification tended towards a less obstructed state on retesting.
  • High reproducibility was noted: 80-85% remained in the same BOO classification, and 85-95% reproduced test results.

Conclusions:

  • Repeated pressure-flow studies can induce physiological changes, potentially underestimating BOO severity.
  • While some variation exists, pressure-flow studies demonstrate good reproducibility for BOO classification.