Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring quality of life: methodological issues.

M Dijkers1

  • 1Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan and the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, Detroit 48201, USA.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
|May 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcome Measures in Quality of Life.

Topics in stroke rehabilitation·2016
Same author

The Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI/WISCI II): nature, metric properties, use and misuse.

Spinal cord·2013
Same author

International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.

Spinal cord·2012
Same author

International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) Classification: Part 2. Initial validation using vignettes.

Spinal cord·2012
Same author

International spinal cord injury pain classification: part I. Background and description. March 6-7, 2009.

Spinal cord·2011
Same author

The Joint Protection Behavior Assessment: a reliability study.

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·2000

This study categorizes quality of life measures by their characteristics, highlighting the philosophical and ethical foundations. It reviews clinimetric properties and discusses methodological challenges in quality of life research.

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Quality of life (QoL) is a multifaceted concept with varied definitions across disciplines, ranging from health utility to life satisfaction.
  • Understanding the underlying assumptions and philosophical underpinnings of QoL measures is crucial for accurate interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a taxonomy of quality of life measures based on their measurement characteristics.
  • To review the clinimetric properties of QoL measures.
  • To discuss key methodological issues in QoL assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of QoL measures based on their inherent measurement characteristics.
  • Review of established clinimetric criteria including validity, reliability, responsiveness, sensitivity, practicality, face validity, and interpretability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of methodological considerations in QoL research.

    • Main Results:

    • A taxonomy of QoL measures is proposed, aligning measurement characteristics with conceptual definitions.
    • Clinimetric properties essential for robust QoL assessment are systematically reviewed.
    • Identified critical methodological issues including measurement of change, generic versus disease-specific tools, and use of self-report versus proxy reporters.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed taxonomy provides a framework for understanding and selecting appropriate QoL measures.
    • Emphasizes the importance of considering philosophical and ethical dimensions in QoL measurement.
    • Highlights the need for careful methodological choices in QoL research to ensure valid and reliable outcomes.