Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Are there qualitative differences between face processing in photographic positive and negative?

C H Liu1, A Chaudhuri

  • 1Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. chang@ego.psych.mcgill.ca

Perception
|May 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Face recognition differs between photographic negatives and positives. Negatives more significantly impair recognition of internal facial features, suggesting a qualitative difference in image processing.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A minimal sampling, in-line spectroscopic calibration method for unstable components during ammoniation of fatty acids.

The Analyst·2025
Same author

'Post-Close' Femoral Arterial Haemostasis at Endovascular Aneurysm Repair using a Dedicated Large-Bore Vascular Closure Device: A Prospective Real-World Audit.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2023
Same author

Re: CIRSE Standards of Practice on Varicocele Embolisation.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2023
Same author

Left Ovarian Vein Varix Phlebectomy at Open Surgery.

EJVES vascular forum·2022
Same author

Improved Midterm Outcomes Using Standard Devices and EndoAnchors for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Hyperangulated Necks.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2020
Same author

Ultrasound Assisted On-Table Management of Type III Endoleak at Endovascular Repair of Isolated Giant Common Iliac Aneurysm.

EJVES short reports·2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Image Processing

Background:

  • Face recognition is a crucial cognitive function.
  • Photographic negatives invert luminance values, potentially altering feature salience.
  • Previous research has not fully elucidated how negative images affect face recognition processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether face recognition in photographic negatives relies more on external features and pictorial cues compared to photographic positives.
  • To compare the recognition of whole faces, external features, and internal features in positive and negative images.
  • To assess the impact of view changes on face recognition in both positive and negative images.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recognition of whole faces, external features, and internal features was compared.
  • Image conditions varied between identical and different views from learning to testing.
  • Both two-tone and multi-tone images were utilized.

    • Main Results:

    • Recognition of internal facial features suffered more in negatives than positives across image types.
    • View changes between learning and testing did not disproportionately impair recognition in negatives compared to positives.
    • Removing external features equally hindered recognition of different views for both positive and negative images.

    Conclusions:

    • Face recognition in photographic negatives involves qualitative differences compared to positives.
    • Internal features are more susceptible to degradation in negative images.
    • The findings suggest distinct processing strategies for positive and negative facial stimuli.