Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual discrimination of direction changes based upon two types of angular motion.

M J Wright1, K N Gurney

  • 1Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK. michael.wright@brunel.ac.uk

Vision Research
|May 27, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Language Ability in Older Adults: Findings from the Older Australian Twins Study.

Behavior genetics·2018
Same author

An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of educational attainment.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Wanted.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

A direct test of the diathesis-stress model for depression.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Subcortical brain structure and suicidal behaviour in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis from the ENIGMA-MDD working group.

Translational psychiatry·2017
Same author

Short telomere length is associated with impaired cognitive performance in European ancestry cohorts.

Translational psychiatry·2017

The visual system distinguishes direction changes differently. Type O changes (orientation shifts) are detected with high accuracy, while Type V changes (speed shifts) require more visual processing stages.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology

Background:

  • The human visual system processes complex motion cues.
  • Understanding how direction changes are perceived is crucial for visual processing models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the visual system's analysis of two distinct types of direction changes in motion stimuli.
  • To compare the discrimination thresholds for Type O (orientation change) and Type V (speed change) direction changes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized plaid stimuli to create Type O and Type V direction changes.
  • Measured discrimination thresholds under varying conditions, including inter-stimulus intervals and drift velocity.
  • Compared performance against computational models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Type O direction changes exhibited low thresholds, resistance to noise, and a low-pass relationship with drift velocity.
  • Type V direction changes showed higher thresholds and a bandpass relationship with drift velocity.
  • Type O discrimination involved a short-range process, unlike Type V.

Conclusions:

  • A two-stage rotary motion model sufficiently explains Type O direction change discrimination.
  • Discrimination of Type V direction changes necessitates a minimum of three computational stages, ruling out simpler models.