Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for improving performance under reverse alignment conditions during endoscopic surgery.

A B Cresswell1, A I Macmillan, G B Hanna

  • 1Department of Surgery and Surgical Skills Unit, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee DDI 9SY, Scotland.

Surgical Endoscopy
|May 29, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Quality of Life of Patients Treated With Robotic Versus Traditional Surgery Results From An Italian Observational Multicenter Study.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

A method for rapid laparoscopic irrigation.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2016
Same author

Propensity score-matched outcomes analysis of the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

The British journal of surgery·2016
Same author

Validation of an oncoplastic breast simulator for assessment of technical skills in wide local excision.

The British journal of surgery·2015
Same author

National proficiency-gain curves for minimally invasive gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

The British journal of surgery·2015
Same author

The two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach for minimal access pancreatic necrosectomy.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2015
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Reverse alignment during endoscopic procedures significantly impairs surgeon performance. However, digital image correction or a 180-degree camera rotation can effectively overcome these challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Surgical Technology
  • Endoscopic Procedures

Background:

  • Endoscopic surgery sometimes requires operating ahead of the camera, leading to reverse alignment (inverted mirror image).
  • This reverse alignment can create significant difficulties for surgeons during procedures.
  • This study investigates the extent of these difficulties and proposes solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of reverse alignment on surgical task performance.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of digital correction and camera rotation in mitigating reverse alignment issues.

Main Methods:

  • Eight specialist registrars performed simulated dissection tasks under 12 imaging conditions.
  • Conditions included normal, reverse, and digitally corrected reverse alignment (horizontal, vertical, combined).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Camera rotation (180 degrees) and varying optical axis angles (45, 60 degrees) were also tested.

    • Main Results:

    • Reverse alignment significantly increased execution time compared to normal viewing (p = 0.036).
    • Simultaneous digital correction of horizontal and vertical axes improved error rates (p = 0.27).
    • A 180-degree camera rotation also significantly reduced errors during reverse alignment (p = 0.28).

    Conclusions:

    • Reverse alignment negatively impacts endoscopic surgical performance.
    • Digital electronic processing offers a solution to overcome reverse alignment challenges.
    • Simple 180-degree camera rotation is an effective method to negate reverse alignment issues.