Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The evolution of evaluation and management coding.

K Bentzen-Bilkvist1

  • 1Ernst & Young, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.

College Review (Denver, Colo.)
|June 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

The WA Goldfields Aboriginal Community Antenatal Program—A community midwifery initiative.

College review (Denver, Colo.)·2017
Same journal

Process modeling for health care organizations.

College review (Denver, Colo.)·1999
Same journal

Welcome to professional courtesy discounts: the medical community's pandora's box.

College review (Denver, Colo.)·1999
Same journal

Building a cohesive employee team in a post-merger practice: a plan to manage change.

College review (Denver, Colo.)·1999
Same journal

Functionality of a nurse practitioner within a hematology/oncology group practice.

College review (Denver, Colo.)·1999
Same journal

The primary care practice in transition: strategies for managing the evolution from fee for service to prepaid care.

College review (Denver, Colo.)·1999
See all related articles

Government attempts to create a uniform Medicare evaluation and management coding system have faced challenges and physician criticism. This paper examines the history of these coding systems and emphasizes the need for physician and administrator compliance.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Medical Economics
  • Healthcare Administration

Background:

  • The implementation of uniform coding systems for Medicare evaluation and management (E/M) services has been a complex and contentious process.
  • Physician feedback on these coding systems has been varied, indicating significant challenges in adoption and understanding.
  • Accurate coding is crucial for reimbursement and quality assessment within the Medicare program.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a historical overview of the development of Medicare E/M coding systems.
  • To analyze the challenges and controversies surrounding the implementation of these uniform coding systems.
  • To underscore the significance of compliance with coding regulations for healthcare providers and administrators.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Historical analysis of Medicare E/M coding policies and guidelines.
  • Review of physician surveys and feedback regarding coding system implementation.
  • Examination of administrative and regulatory documents pertaining to coding compliance.

    • Main Results:

    • The evolution of Medicare E/M coding has been marked by frequent revisions and a lack of consistent physician consensus.
    • Significant barriers to compliance include the complexity of coding rules and perceived administrative burdens.
    • Mixed reactions from physicians highlight the need for improved communication and support during system transitions.

    Conclusions:

    • The development of a universally accepted Medicare E/M coding system remains an ongoing challenge.
    • Effective physician and administrator compliance is essential for the integrity of the Medicare program and equitable reimbursement.
    • Future efforts should focus on simplifying coding structures and enhancing provider education to foster better adherence.