Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
Published on: August 15, 2010
Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition
J H Searcy1, J C Bartlett, A Memon
1School of Human Development, University of Texas at Dallas 75083-0688, USA. searcy@utdallas.edu
Abstract:
Studies of aging and face recognition show age-related increases in false recognitions of new faces. To explore implications of this false alarm effect, we had young and senior adults perform (1) three eye-witness identification tasks, using both target present and target absent lineups, and (2) and old/new recognition task in which a study list of faces was followed by a test including old and new faces, along with conjunctions of old faces. Compared with the young, seniors had lower accuracy and higher choosing rates on the lineups, and they also falsely recognized more new faces on the recognition test. However, after screening for perceptual processing deficits, there was no age difference in false recognition of conjunctions, or in discriminating old faces from conjunctions. We conclude that the false alarm effect generalizes to lineup identification, but does not extend to conjunction faces. The findings are consistent with age-related deficits in recollection of context and relative age invariance in perceptual integrative processes underlying the experience of familiarity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Prosopagnosia
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
First Impression
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

