Related Experiment Videos
Incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia: a prospective analysis
L D Tackett1, C K Breuer, F I Luks
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Brown University School of Medicine, and Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
|June 8, 1999
Summary
Routine contralateral groin exploration is not recommended for most children with unilateral inguinal hernia. However, it may be advisable for infants with incarceration or premature infants due to higher risks.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
- Hernia Management
Background:
- Contralateral groin exploration in pediatric unilateral inguinal hernia remains a debated topic, especially in infants.
- Current practices vary regarding routine bilateral procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the age- and gender-stratified incidence of contralateral inguinal hernias in children initially presenting with unilateral hernias.
- To evaluate the necessity of routine bilateral inguinal exploration versus ipsilateral-only procedures.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study of 656 pediatric patients over 34 months.
- Patients with unilateral inguinal hernia received ipsilateral surgery only.
- Follow-up ranged from 6 to 40 months, with statistical analysis (chi-square) for comparisons.
Main Results:
- 16.5% of patients had synchronous bilateral hernias, with higher rates in premature infants (28.0%) and those under 2 years.
- A metachronous contralateral hernia developed in 8.8% of remaining patients.
- Higher incidence of contralateral hernias was observed in infants under 6 months (12.4%), under 2 years (10.6%), premature infants (14.8%), and those with incarcerated hernias (27.6%).
Conclusions:
- Routine contralateral inguinal exploration is not justified for the general pediatric population with unilateral inguinal hernia.
- Consideration for contralateral exploration may be warranted in cases of hernia incarceration and possibly in premature infants.
- The low incidence of contralateral hernias in most patient groups supports limiting exploration to the symptomatic side.