Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality assurance in screening programmes.

J A Gray1, J Austoker

  • 1Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK.

British Medical Bulletin
|June 15, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of the charge asymmetry in top quark pair production in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] using the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Search for lepton flavour violation in the <i>eμ</i> continuum with the ATLAS detector in [Formula: see text]<i>pp</i> collisions at the LHC.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of [Formula: see text] production with a veto on additional central jet activity in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] TeV using the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of the top quark mass with the template method in the [Formula: see text] channel using ATLAS data.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Search for heavy neutrinos and right-handed <i>W</i> bosons in events with two leptons and jets in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same author

Measurement of <i>τ</i> polarization in <i>W</i>→<i>τν</i> decays with the ATLAS detector in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text].

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
Same journal

Augmentation in Achilles tendon repair: evidence versus enthusiasm.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Regional musculoskeletal pain in workers-is the traditional medical model increasing disability?

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Human health in relation to visible, functional, and accessible green space: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the 3 + 30 + 300 guideline.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Muscle herniae in exercise-induced leg pain: diagnostic pitfalls and the 'repair paradox'.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Scaffolds and platelet concentrates in bone regenerative medicine: applications, mechanisms, and future approaches.

British medical bulletin·2026
Same journal

Back squat and deadlift fatiguing protocols elicit distinct countermovement jump profiles: phase-specific predictors and soreness responses.

British medical bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Screening programs involve risks and benefits. Policymakers must evaluate the balance of good versus harm for successful implementation and quality standards.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Policy
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Screening programs aim to detect diseases early.
  • All health interventions, including screening, carry potential harms.
  • The net benefit of screening is a critical consideration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the inherent harm-benefit ratio in all screening programs.
  • To outline the responsibilities of policymakers in implementing screening.
  • To emphasize the importance of quality standards in screening success.

Main Methods:

  • Policy analysis of screening program implementation.
  • Benefit-harm assessment framework for public health interventions.
  • Evaluation of cost-effectiveness in relation to health outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All screening programs incur some level of harm.
  • The benefit-harm ratio is dynamic and not static.
  • Successful implementation requires confidence in achieving quality standards.

Conclusions:

  • Policymakers must weigh benefits against harms for cost-effective screening.
  • Achieving high-quality standards is essential for successful screening programs.
  • The balance of benefit versus harm requires ongoing evaluation.