Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tops are more salient than bottoms.

K W Chambers1, M K McBeath, D J Schiano

  • 1Kent State University, Ohio, USA. kwc@mad.scientist.com

Perception & Psychophysics
|June 17, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring and modeling facial affect.

Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc·2001
Same author

Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: a central, analytic process.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1999
Same author

Forward-facing motion biases for rigid and nonrigid biologically likely transformations.

Perceptual and motor skills·1998
Same author

The Doppler illusion: the influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1996
Same author

Response: on catching fly balls.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1996
Same author

Response.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1995
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

People tend to focus more on the tops of objects than the bottoms. This visual bias, observed in shape-matching experiments, suggests tops are perceived as more important for understanding object function and intent.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Observers assume objects are oriented within a gravitational coordinate system.
  • Attention is often directed towards object parts typically located at the top, such as faces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a potential generic bias in visual perception where the top of an object is considered more salient than the bottom.
  • To determine if this top-salience bias influences how observers perceive object similarity.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using random shapes.
  • Participants judged the similarity of shapes based on shared top or bottom features.
  • Global shape attributes like elongation and size were also considered.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A consistent tendency for observers to match shapes with similar tops was observed.
  • Matching choices were influenced by both top features and global shape characteristics.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support the hypothesis of a top-salience bias in visual perception.
  • This bias aligns with the natural prevalence of tops being more visible and informative for object function and intentionality.