Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Reproducibility of guidelines. A comparison of the NCCN and ASCO lung cancer guidelines
R J Winn1, N H Brown, W Z Botnick
1UT M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Abstract:
Clinical practice guidelines are reproducible if two groups of experts, presented with the same evidence and methods, derive similar recommendations. Reproducibility is an essential attribute in justifying the use of clinical practice guidelines to guide and monitor physicians' practices. This article will compare guidelines for the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) with guidelines derived by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). This comparison aims to determine whether the two guidelines are similar or whether there are major differences that pose significant problems for clinicians attempting to manage patients according to one oncology standard.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
05:17Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
Published on: October 10, 2025