Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continuing medical education and industry support.

C R Conti

    Clinical Cardiology
    |June 22, 1999
    PubMed
    Summary

    Industry support for continuing medical education (CME) must prioritize scientific integrity and educational goals. Faculty must maintain independence, disclose financial ties, and present balanced, objective information for CME programs.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Treatment of mechanical valve thrombosis during pregnancy.

    Clinical cardiology·2007
    Same author

    Re-thinking angina.

    Clinical cardiology·2007
    Same author

    Inhibition of sodium-dependent calcium overload to treat myocardial ischemia.

    Clinical cardiology·2006
    Same author

    Clinical usefulness of electron beam computed tomography to detect coronary artery calcification.

    Clinical cardiology·2002
    Same author

    Prognosis after ICD implantation.

    Clinical cardiology·2001
    Same author

    How will INVEST and other hypertension trials change clinical practice?

    Clinical cardiology·2001

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Healthcare Ethics
    • Scientific Communication

    Background:

    • Continuing Medical Education (CME) programs often receive industry funding.
    • Ensuring the independence and objectivity of CME content is crucial for maintaining trust and educational value.
    • Guidelines are necessary to govern the relationship between industry sponsors and CME providers.

    Discussion:

    • Industry support for CME must be strictly for educational purposes, not product promotion.
    • Program content, presenter selection, and moderation must be controlled by the program director, independent of industry influence.
    • Faculty must disclose all financial relationships with sponsoring companies to ensure transparency.

    Key Insights:

    • Maintaining objectivity and balance in CME presentations is paramount, including discussing both favorable and unfavorable data and alternative treatments.
    • Faculty must clearly identify incomplete data, specifying its status (e.g., ongoing research, preliminary data).
    • Industry financial support should be provided as unconditional educational grants.

    Outlook:

    • Adherence to these principles will enhance the quality and credibility of CME.
    • Promoting transparency and independence in CME fosters a more informed healthcare professional community.
    • Future CME initiatives should continue to prioritize unbiased scientific exchange.

    Related Experiment Videos