Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.

R Ratcliff1, T Van Zandt, G McKoon

  • 1Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA.

Psychological Review
|June 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.

Annual review of psychology·2015
Same author

Set size and order requirements in immediate memory.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Statistical mimicking of reaction time data: Single-process models, parameter variability, and mixtures.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Conceptual combinations and relational contexts in free association and in priming in lexical decision and naming.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Expression and regulation of the Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter NKCC1 in the normal and CFTR-deficient murine colon.

The Journal of physiology·2003
Same author

cAMP-mediated regulation of murine intestinal/pancreatic Na+/HCO3- cotransporter subtype pNBC1.

American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology·2002

The diffusion model accurately explains signal detection data, including error reaction times. Connectionist models showed limitations, highlighting the diffusion model

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Connectionist models like GRAIN and brain-state-in-a-box are influential in cognitive modeling.
  • Reaction time research traditionally focuses on decision processes over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the explanatory power of two connectionist frameworks and a diffusion model.
  • To assess model performance on signal detection task data, including reaction times and response probabilities.

Main Methods:

  • Signal detection task data analysis.
  • Comparison of GRAIN, brain-state-in-a-box, and diffusion models.
  • Analysis of response probabilities, reaction times (correct and error), and reaction time distributions.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The diffusion model successfully accounted for all data aspects, notably error reaction times.
  • Connectionist models demonstrated adequacy in some areas but had significant limitations.
  • One connectionist model showed similarity to the diffusion model.

Conclusions:

  • The diffusion model is advanced by these findings, offering a robust explanation for signal detection data.
  • The study validates reaction time research as a critical area for testing computational models of decision-making.
  • Connectionist assumptions regarding decision generation over time require further refinement and testing.