Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetically and medically susceptible workers.

S Mohr1, M Gochfeld, G Pransky

  • 1Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA.

Occupational Medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)
|June 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Needs and wishes of Gen Z medical students: a prospective cross sectional single center study.

Langenbeck's archives of surgery·2026
Same author

Simulated shared and supported decision making for amyloid immunotherapy in Alzheimer's disease: A bicentric study.

Revue neurologique·2026
Same author

[Short version of the S2k guideline on drug therapy of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD)].

Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2022
Same author

[Acute management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage].

La Revue de medecine interne·2021
Same author

[Management of ischemic stroke in the acute phase].

La Revue de medecine interne·2021
Same author

Immune Signature of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma as Assessed by Transcriptome Analysis.

Cancer genomics & proteomics·2019
Same journal

Mental health issues: ethical considerations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethics in the locker room: the challenges for team physicians.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethical issues in worker productivity.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Protecting posterity: the occupational physician's ethical and legal obligations to pregnant workers.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Genetic testing: ethical implications in the workplace.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
Same journal

Ethical issues in occupational disease outbreak investigations.

Occupational medicine (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2002
See all related articles

Individual health risks from hazardous materials depend on genetics and current health. Protecting worker health requires better use of this data, as current evidence for job exclusion is often insufficient.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Genetics
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Worker susceptibility to hazardous materials is influenced by genetic makeup and health status.
  • Advances in understanding human variation and disease diagnosis have not translated to effective worker health protection.
  • Current scientific evidence for increased susceptibility is often weak, failing to meet legal standards for job exclusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the challenges in using genetic and health information to protect worker health.
  • To assess the justification for legally mandated exclusions from work based on public safety concerns.
  • To propose a framework for medical opinions on fitness to work.

Main Methods:

  • Review of scientific literature on genetic polymorphisms and health variations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of legal thresholds for occupational risk assessment.
  • Examination of medical opinions and fitness-to-work evaluations.

    • Main Results:

    • Limited progress in applying genetic and health data to worker protection.
    • Many public safety-related job exclusions lack strong scientific justification.
    • Existing frameworks for fitness-to-work assessments are often inadequate.

    Conclusions:

    • Medical assessments for fitness to work require systematic analysis of conditions, job risks, and accommodations.
    • Conclusions must acknowledge scientific uncertainties and adhere to anti-discrimination laws.
    • Improved integration of scientific knowledge and legal guidance is needed for effective worker health protection.