Related Experiment Videos
Informed consent: British otolaryngologists surveyed.
Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences
|June 29, 1999
Summary
British otolaryngologists maintain high standards in obtaining informed consent from patients. Practices have evolved, with more consent sought in outpatient and preadmission settings, reflecting increased awareness of material risk.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Medical Ethics
- Health Law
Background:
- Informed consent is crucial in medical practice.
- Previous studies highlighted good practice among British otolaryngologists.
- Changes in medical practice necessitate re-evaluation of informed consent procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess changes in informed consent practices among British otolaryngologists since 1991.
- To evaluate the level of good practice in obtaining informed consent.
- To identify trends in consultant and registrar involvement and awareness of material risk.
Main Methods:
- Repeat postal questionnaire survey of British otolaryngologists.
- Comparison of current practices with data from 1991.
- Analysis of changes in the timing and setting of informed consent acquisition.
- Assessment of practitioner involvement and reporting of surgical complications.
Main Results:
- High levels of good practice in obtaining informed consent are maintained.
- Informed consent is now more frequently obtained in outpatient or preadmission clinics compared to 1991.
- Consultants and specialist registrars show increased involvement in the informed consent process.
- Changes in reporting surgical complications suggest heightened awareness of 'material risk'.
Conclusions:
- The standard of good practice in informed consent among British otolaryngologists remains high.
- Informed consent procedures have adapted to outpatient and preadmission settings.
- Increased awareness of material risk may be influencing the reporting of surgical complications.