Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cognitive deficits in the elderly: a research on environmental effects on psychometrics.

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement·2001

Same author

Six-year outcome for cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms in major depression.

The American journal of psychiatry·1998

Same author

Cognitive deficits in the elderly: interactive theories and a study of environmental effects on psychometric intelligence.

Aging (Milan, Italy)·1997

Same author

Four-year outcome for cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms in major depression.

The American journal of psychiatry·1996

Same author

Prodromal symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Psychopathology·1996

Same author

Cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms in primary major depressive disorder.

The American journal of psychiatry·1994

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Relationship between ideology and science.

¹Professore di Psicologia, Facolt di Medicina e Chirurgia, Universit di Bologna, Italy.

Forum (Genoa, Italy)

|July 1, 1999

Summary

Ideology can emerge from cognitive processes without critical scrutiny, differing from scientific knowledge. Scientific research, when controlled, remains independent of ideological influences.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Philosophy of Science

Background:

Distinguishes between ideological and research-based knowledge.
Highlights the cognitive processes underlying knowledge formation.

Purpose of the Study:

To demonstrate how ideology can arise from cognitive processes.
To differentiate ideological from scientific thought and knowledge production.
To identify ideological influences on professional research.

Main Methods:

Experimental work on illusory correlations and serial effects.
Analysis of cognitive difficulties, such as 'grasping counter-examples'.
Comparative analysis of the characteristics of ideological and scientific thought.

Main Results:

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Ideology can develop from cognitive processes (perception, thought) without critical scrutiny.
Ideological propositions are anti-empirical and avoid counter-examples, unlike scientific ones.
Controlled scientific research results become autonomous and independent of initial ideological inspiration.

Conclusions:

The functioning of cognitive processes can lead to ideological knowledge if not critically examined.
Social conditions shape the production of ideological versus scientific knowledge.
Scientific rigor ensures the independence of research findings from ideological biases.