Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

APOB to estimated APOB ratio for screening for the APOE2 genotype.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Effect of consumption of anthocyanin-rich products on NMR lipoprotein subclasses and biomarkers in hypercholesterolemic subjects: a randomized controlled trial (the AppleCOR study).

Food & function·2025
Same author

Klotho: a humeral mediator in CSF and plasma that influences longevity and susceptibility to multiple complex disorders, including depression.

Translational psychiatry·2016
Same author

Amphipathic polyproline peptides stimulate cholesterol efflux by the ABCA1 transporter.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2016
Same author

Lipoprotein Particles in Adolescents and Young Women With PCOS Provide Insights Into Their Cardiovascular Risk.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2015
Same author

Measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in assessment and management of cardiovascular disease risk.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Prevalence-value-accuracy plots: a new method for comparing diagnostic tests based on misclassification costs.

A T Remaley1, M L Sampson, J M DeLeo

  • 1National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Clinical Pathology Department, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. aremaley@nih.gov

Clinical Chemistry
|July 1, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces prevalence-value-accuracy (PVA) plots, a new graphical method for evaluating diagnostic tests. PVA plots enhance accuracy analysis by incorporating disease prevalence and misclassification costs for better clinical utility assessment.

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
09:00

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Health economics

Background:

  • Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis is standard for diagnostic test accuracy.
  • ROC plots do not account for disease prevalence or the economic impact of test outcomes.
  • Practical diagnostic test utility depends on prevalence and misclassification costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel graphical method, Prevalence-Value-Accuracy (PVA) plot analysis.
  • To incorporate disease prevalence and misclassification costs into diagnostic test performance evaluation.
  • To provide a more comprehensive assessment of diagnostic test utility beyond traditional ROC analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed PVA plots as contour plots visualizing misclassification costs.
  • Defined the Unit Cost Ratio (UCR) to represent relative costs of false positives vs. false negatives.
  • Introduced a PVA-threshold plot for identifying optimal decision thresholds.

Main Results:

  • PVA plots display minimum misclassification costs across varying prevalence and UCR.
  • A quantitative index based on misclassification costs can be derived from PVA plots.
  • PVA analysis can yield different comparative interpretations than ROC area, especially within clinically relevant ranges.

Conclusions:

  • PVA plot analysis directly integrates prevalence and misclassification costs.
  • It offers a quantitative index for comparing diagnostic tests based on cost-effectiveness.
  • PVA analysis facilitates identification of optimal decision thresholds tailored to specific clinical contexts.