Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protein adhesion force dynamics and single adhesion events.

G Sagvolden1

  • 1Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. geir.sagvolden@fys.uio.no

Biophysical Journal
|July 2, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study used a new type of atomic force microscope to measure how strongly different proteins stick to two common materials: glass and polystyrene. The researchers tracked the force needed to move a tiny bead covered with a specific protein across each surface over a wide range of times. On polystyrene, the adhesion force followed a predictable pattern with no typical time scale. On glass, the adhesion rate varied depending on the protein's charge. The team identified forces from single protein adhesion events and estimated the rupture force for each protein on glass. These forces were linked to the stiffness of the proteins. The findings suggest that adhesion behavior depends on both the surface and the protein's properties.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cell adhesion force microscopy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1999
Same author

Frequent reward eliminates differences in activity between hyperkinetic rats and controls.

Behavioral and neural biology·1993
Same author

The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) as an animal model of childhood hyperactivity (ADHD): changed reactivity to reinforcers and to psychomotor stimulants.

Behavioral and neural biology·1992
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics of protein-substrate interactions
  • Surface adhesion mechanics in biomaterials
  • Protein adsorption dynamics in materials science

Background:

Prior research has shown that proteins adhere to surfaces through complex interactions influenced by charge, hydrophobicity, and conformational flexibility. However, the temporal behavior of adhesion forces and the rupture forces of individual protein molecules remain poorly understood. Established knowledge includes the role of electrostatic forces in protein adsorption, but the exact mechanisms governing adhesion over time are unclear. This gap motivated the need to quantify adhesion forces across multiple time scales and substrates. No prior work had resolved how protein stiffness correlates with rupture forces. Researchers have explored protein adsorption on glass and plastic surfaces, but with limited resolution on single-molecule events. The uncertainty around time-dependent adhesion dynamics drove this investigation. This study builds on existing work by introducing a novel atomic force microscope to track adhesion forces dynamically. The goal is to clarify how protein properties influence adhesion behavior at the single-molecule level.

Keywords:
protein adhesionatomic force microscopysingle molecule adhesionprotein-substrate interactions

Frequently Asked Questions

The adhesion force on polystyrene follows a power law with an exponent of 0.37 ± 0.03, indicating no typical time scale for adhesion.

The rupture force was estimated using a model of the experimental system based on microsphere displacement measurements.

The rate of adhesion on glass depends strongly on protein charge, as observed in the study.

The rupture forces correlate with protein stiffness, as shown by the data for lysozyme, myoglobin, and others.

Related Experiment Videos

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to measure the adhesion forces of specific proteins to two common substrates, glass and polystyrene, using a novel manipulation force microscope. The specific problem addressed was the lack of detailed data on how adhesion forces evolve over time and how they relate to individual protein molecules. The motivation stemmed from the need to better understand the physical basis of protein-substrate adhesion. Researchers wanted to determine if adhesion forces followed predictable patterns and how they varied with protein type and substrate. The study also sought to estimate rupture forces for individual proteins. By focusing on bovine serum albumin, myoglobin, ferritin, and lysozyme, the authors aimed to compare adhesion behaviors across different molecular structures. The manipulation force microscope allowed for high-resolution tracking of adhesion forces over multiple orders of magnitude in time. The ultimate goal was to link adhesion forces to protein stiffness and substrate properties.

Main Methods:

The manipulation force microscope was used to measure adhesion forces by tracking the force needed to displace a microsphere coated with a specific protein. The microsphere was moved across glass and polystyrene substrates over several orders of magnitude in time. The force data were analyzed to determine the power law exponent for adhesion on each substrate. A model of the experimental system was developed to estimate the rupture force of individual proteins. The adhesion forces were compared across different proteins and substrates to identify trends. The study focused on four proteins: bovine serum albumin, myoglobin, ferritin, and lysozyme. The microsphere displacement was monitored to detect single adhesion events. The rupture forces were calculated using the model and compared to the stiffness of each protein.

Main Results:

On polystyrene, the adhesion force followed a power law with an exponent of 0.37 ± 0.03, suggesting no typical time scale for adhesion. On glass, adhesion rates varied strongly with protein charge. Single adhesion events were identified through force measurements. The rupture force for lysozyme on glass was estimated at 90 ± 10 pN. Myoglobin had a rupture force of 115 ± 13 pN on glass. Bovine serum albumin and ferritin both had rupture forces of 277 ± 44 pN on glass. These forces correlated with the stiffness of the respective proteins. The force amplitudes on polystyrene also showed a correlation with protein stiffness. The results indicate that adhesion behavior is influenced by both substrate properties and protein characteristics.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that adhesion forces on polystyrene follow a power law with no typical time scale. They propose that adhesion on glass is strongly influenced by protein charge. The study estimates rupture forces for individual proteins adhering to glass. These forces correlate with protein stiffness, according to the authors. The manipulation force microscope enabled the detection of single adhesion events. The results indicate that adhesion behavior is substrate-dependent. The findings may help in understanding how protein properties affect adhesion dynamics. The authors suggest that the observed correlations could inform future studies on protein-substrate interactions.

The estimated rupture force is 277 ± 44 pN for bovine serum albumin on glass.

The study suggests that adhesion dynamics are influenced by both substrate properties and protein characteristics.