Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Compliance with methodological standards when evaluating ophthalmic diagnostic tests.

R Harper1, B Reeves

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, United Kingdom.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|July 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creating therapeutic relationships through communication: a qualitative metasynthesis from the perspectives of people with communication impairment after stroke.

Disability and rehabilitation·2020
Same author

Multi-omic analysis of the effects of low frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

International journal of cardiology·2020
Same author

Evaluation of an early-stage innovation for full-thickness excision of benign colonic polyps using the IDEAL framework.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2019
Same author

Towards speciation of organically bound tritium and deuterium: Quantification of non-exchangeable forms in carbohydrate molecules.

Chemosphere·2018
Same author

New insight into the ternary complexes of uranyl carbonate in seawater.

Journal of environmental radioactivity·2017
Same author

Phase IIa study of dabigatran etexilate in children with venous thrombosis: pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2017

Evaluations of ophthalmic diagnostic tests show poor adherence to methodological standards, with few studies meeting basic criteria. Improving reporting can prevent the adoption of ineffective technologies and conserve healthcare resources.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Methodological standards are crucial for evaluating ophthalmic diagnostic tests.
  • Previous reviews indicate suboptimal compliance in general medical journals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess compliance with methodological standards in published ophthalmic diagnostic test evaluations.
  • To highlight the importance of robust evaluation methods in ophthalmology.

Main Methods:

  • Independent review of 20 ophthalmic diagnostic test evaluations.
  • Assessment focused on spectrum composition, subgroup analysis, bias avoidance, precision, indeterminate results, and reproducibility.

Main Results:

  • Compliance varied significantly, with low rates for test reproducibility (10%) and review bias avoidance (10%).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Avoidance of work-up bias and presentation of indeterminate results showed higher compliance (70%).
  • Only 5 of 20 studies met four or more methodological standards.

    • Conclusions:

    • Ophthalmic diagnostic test evaluations exhibit limited adherence to established methodological standards.
    • Improved adherence can enhance study design and reporting, preventing resource waste.
    • Lack of awareness may lead to inappropriate adoption of new diagnostic technologies.