Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Middle ear reconstructive techniques.

R A Chole1, D J Skarada

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|July 7, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Keratin particle-induced osteolysis: a mouse model of inflammatory bone remodeling related to cholesteatoma.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2001
Same author

Effects of catecholamines on calvarial bone resorption in vitro.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2001
Same author

Expression patterns of cytokeratins in retraction pocket cholesteatomas.

The Laryngoscope·2001
Same author

Chronic bacterial rhinosinusitis: description of a mouse model.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2001
Same author

Invasiveness of fibroblasts from experimental cholesteatomas.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
Same author

Effect of chemical sympathectomy with 6-hydroxydopamine on osteoclast activity in the gerbilline middle ear bulla.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
Same journal

Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Impact on Medical and Surgical Management.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Little Tube; Big Problems: Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Current State of Button Battery Ingestion Injuries.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Algorithm for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Indications for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revisiting Eustachian Tube Anatomy and Physiology.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Otolaryngologists have many middle ear reconstruction options, but no single technique is best for all cases. This review highlights successful techniques based on hearing outcomes and extrusion resistance for common surgical challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Hearing Reconstruction

Background:

  • Numerous middle ear reconstructive techniques exist, overwhelming surgeons with choices.
  • Current literature lacks direct comparisons and standardized success criteria for these techniques.
  • Optimal surgical strategies for middle ear reconstruction remain undefined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and present successful middle ear reconstructive techniques.
  • To address the lack of comparative data and defined success metrics in surgical options.
  • To guide otolaryngologists in selecting optimal techniques for specific surgical scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature focusing on hearing results and extrusion resistance.
  • Analysis of surgical techniques based on established success criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of proven methods for common otologic surgical dilemmas.

    • Main Results:

    • Hearing outcomes and resistance to extrusion are key measures of success.
    • Specific techniques have demonstrated efficacy in addressing common surgical challenges.
    • No single technique is universally optimal for all middle ear reconstruction scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective middle ear reconstruction relies on careful selection of techniques.
    • Success is best measured by hearing improvement and implant durability.
    • Evidence-based guidance is provided for otolaryngologists facing reconstructive choices.