Interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy: potential advantages of locoregional versus systemic administration
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2026

Intralymphatic Immunotherapy and Vaccination in Mice
Published on: February 2, 2014
M R Bernsen1, J W Tang, L A Everse
1Department of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80.176, Utrecht, 3508 TD, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
There has been an apparent discrepancy between the results obtained with IL-2 based immunotherapy in animal tumour models, including veterinary cancer patients, and human cancer patients. We argue that this is due to differences in the therapeutic regimens used to treat human and veterinary cancer patients. The main differences are systemic therapy and surgical removal of the primary tumour in case of human cancer patients, whereas these treatment modalities are not used in IL-2 treated veterinary cancer cases. We have developed a treatment protocol, in which IL-2 is applied locally, that has been successful against transplanted tumours as well as spontaneous tumours of varying origin and immunogenicity. In view of immunobiological considerations we conclude that local treatment of cancer with IL-2 makes more sense than systemic treatment, as usually applied in the clinic, and that surgical removal of tumours may be detrimental to successful IL-2 therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
