Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confounded by confounding: separating association from causation.

H T Davies1, F L Williams

  • 1Department of Management, University of St Andrews, Fife.

Hospital Medicine (London, England : 1998)
|July 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teenagers' perception of agreement over family expenditures, employment, and family life.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

Correlation between substrate preparation technique and scatter observed from optical coatings.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

A randomized comparative crossover study to assess the affect on circuit life of varying pre-dilution volume associated with CVVH and CVVHDF.

The International journal of artificial organs·2008
Same author

Inferring Plio-Pleistocene southern African biochronology from facial affinities in Parapapio and other fossil papionins.

American journal of physical anthropology·2006
Same author

Improving care or professional advantage? What makes clinicians do audit and how well do they fare?

Health bulletin·2003
Same author

Coupling fields and underlying space curvature: an augmented Lagrangian approach.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2003
Same journal

Management of non-thrombolysable acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Case report: treatment of faecaloma of the colon.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Should anaesthetists scrub? The case for and against.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Angiosarcoma: a difficult diagnosis.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Pitfalls in recurrent varicose vein surgery.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Aorto-caval fistula.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
See all related articles

Health professionals must differentiate causality from association to understand disease causes and treatment effects. Confounding factors can obscure true relationships, requiring careful assessment to avoid misleading conclusions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Distinguishing causal relationships from mere associations is critical for healthcare professionals.
  • Understanding disease aetiology and evaluating therapeutic effects rely on accurate causal inference.
  • Confounding variables pose a significant challenge, potentially leading to erroneous conclusions in both research and practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the nature of confounding in health research.
  • To provide criteria for distinguishing true causality from statistical associations.
  • To aid healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding disease aetiology and treatment efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual explanation of confounding.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Outline of criteria for causal inference.
  • Discussion of the impact of confounding on research interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Confounding can seriously mislead when assessing disease causes or therapy effects.
    • Clear criteria can help differentiate causal links from statistical associations.
    • Recognizing and addressing confounding is essential for valid scientific conclusions.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare professionals require methods to identify confounding.
    • Applying specific criteria aids in distinguishing causality from association.
    • Accurate causal inference is fundamental to advancing medical knowledge and patient care.