Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking pathology services: implementing a longitudinal study.

M Gordon1, S Holmes, K McGrath

  • 1Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and BioStatistics, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Pathology
|July 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification and tentative removal of collagen glue in Palaeolithic worked bone objects: implications for ZooMS and radiocarbon dating.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Comparison of Risk-Prediction Instruments in Frail Older Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2022
Same author

Emerging Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells in Preeclampsia.

Current hypertension reports·2020
Same author

Meteorology of the Punjab for the Years 1867 and 1868.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

Medullary Cancer of the Lower End of Femur and Head of the Tibia;-Amputation.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

Fibrous Tumour of the Upper Jaw Removal.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same journal

Impact of the 2025 Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism for the clinical laboratory.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Cribriform intraductal carcinoma of the prostate may have a greater prognostic impact even than Gleason grade 5 conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Bordetella pertussis: emerging epidemiology, diagnosis and management.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Haycocknema perplexum.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Recent advances in the understanding of TP53 in haematological malignancies.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Concurrent renal amyloid light chain amyloidosis, light chain crystalline podocytopathy and light chain proximal tubulopathy: a case report.

Pathology·2026
See all related articles

This study details pathology laboratory benchmarking, highlighting challenges in data handling and analysis. It presents a framework for public health settings and reviews the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasian (RCPA) Benchmarking Project's development and preliminary findings.

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Benchmarking is crucial for evaluating and improving laboratory performance.
  • The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasian (RCPA) initiated a benchmarking pilot study to assess pathology laboratory activities.
  • Understanding the process and challenges of benchmarking is essential for its successful implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the benchmarking process applied to pathology laboratories within the RCPA Benchmarking Project.
  • To identify and discuss challenges in collecting, processing, analyzing, and comparing benchmark data.
  • To outline the benefits of benchmarking and provide a transferable framework for public health settings.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive analysis of the benchmarking process used in the pilot study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Qualitative review of issues encountered during data management.
  • Application of benchmarking principles to the development and review of the RCPA project.

    • Main Results:

    • The study identified significant challenges in data collection, processing, analysis, and comparison.
    • Preliminary results from the RCPA Benchmarking Project offer insights into laboratory performance.
    • A framework for applying benchmarking in public health settings was developed.

    Conclusions:

    • Benchmarking provides valuable insights and benefits for pathology laboratories.
    • Addressing data management challenges is critical for effective benchmarking.
    • The RCPA Benchmarking Project's framework and preliminary findings have implications for ongoing quality improvement in pathology services.