Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Pulmonary Lobectomy.

Walker1

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and Associated Hospitals, Edinburgh, Scotland

Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery
|December 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is a safe and feasible surgical option. Compared to open surgery, VATS lobectomy offers reduced pain and fewer respiratory complications, with comparable survival rates for early-stage lung cancer.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case of Dislocation of the Scaphoid Bone of the Foot.

Medical examiner (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2023
Same author

Correspondence.

Atlanta journal-record of medicine·2022
Same author

Diarrhœas of Children.

The Southern medical record·2022
Same author

Perceptions of electronic cigarettes among ethno-culturally diverse Latino adults in four US urban centers.

Ethnicity & health·2020
Same author

Manchester Eye Hospital: Injury of the eye from a percussion-cap. Sinking of the injured eye.

Provincial medical & surgical journal·2011
Same author

Dental practice management.

District of Columbia Dental Society journal. District of Columbia Dental Society·2010

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is an alternative to open lobectomy.
  • Current VATS techniques include endoscopic hilar dissection, minithoracotomy, and mass stapling.
  • VATS lobectomy is established as a technically feasible and safe procedure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of VATS lobectomy.
  • To compare VATS lobectomy with open lobectomy regarding postoperative complications and survival.
  • To explore potential immunologic benefits of VATS.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and reported results of VATS lobectomy techniques.
  • Comparison of postoperative pain, respiratory complications, and lymph node harvest between VATS and open lobectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of intermediate survival data for early-stage (I or II) bronchogenic carcinoma.

    • Main Results:

    • VATS lobectomy is technically feasible and safe, with outcomes comparable to open lobectomy.
    • VATS is associated with less postoperative pain and a lower incidence of respiratory complications.
    • Lymph node harvest is equivalent to open surgery, and survival data for early-stage lung cancer are comparable.

    Conclusions:

    • VATS lobectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open lobectomy for lung cancer.
    • VATS offers significant advantages in terms of reduced postoperative morbidity.
    • Preliminary data suggest potential benefits in reduced cytokine activation and altered immune responses with VATS.