Caesarean section and other methods for assisted delivery: comparison of effects on mare mortality and complications

Data from 116 mares that had caesarean section or vaginal delivery at 2 university hospitals were analysed in 5 groups, as follows: dystocia corrected by caesarean section, Group DCS (n = 48); elective caesarean section, Group ECS (n = 10); caesarean section concurrently with colic surgery, Group CCS (n = 8); assisted vaginal delivery, Group AVD (n = 22); and controlled vaginal delivery under general anaesthesia, Group CVD (n = 28). Survival rate in all mares that had caesarean section, excluding Group CCS, was 88% (51/58). All mares in Group ECS survived and Group CCS had the lowest survival rate (38%). In 98 mares with dystocia, Groups DCS (15%) and AVD (14%) had significantly lower (P<0.05) mortality rates than Group CVD (29%). There were no differences between groups for duration of dystocia. The placenta was retained in 75 (65%) of 116 mares, and for a longer period following elective caesarean section than following assisted vaginal delivery. Multiple complications (> or = 3) were recorded in 6 mares in Group CVD but not in the other groups. Of the 102 foals delivered from 98 mares with dystocia, 11 (11%) were alive at delivery and 5 (5%) survived to discharge. Survival rate for foals was 38% in Group CCS, and 90% in Group ECS. Under conditions similar to those in this study, it is calculated that caesarean section is preferable to CVD if dystocia is protracted and great difficulty and trauma is involved, even if CVD allows delivery of the foal.