Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motor performance with a simulated artificial limb.

S A Wallace1, D I Anderson, D Anderson

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, CA 94132-4161, USA. saw@sfsu.edu

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|July 17, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Federal control of Indian Lands v. State control of Gaming - Cabazon Bingo and the Indian Gaming regulatory act.

Journal of gambling studies·2013
Same author

Developing staffing standards. Statistical considerations for patient care administrators.

The Journal of nursing administration·1999
Same author

Cognitive development among nurses.

Nursing diagnosis : ND : the official journal of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association·1998
Same author

Five- and eight-month-old infants recognize their faces and voices as familiar and social stimuli.

Child development·1998
Same author

The International Comet Assay Workshop.

Mutagenesis·1998
Same author

Calibration of the single cell gel electrophoresis assay, flow cytometry analysis and forward mutation in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Mutagenesis·1998
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Autonomic Responses During Kinesthetic Motor Imagery in Healthy Adults: A Multimodal Assessment Using HRV and EDA.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

Performance with a simulated prosthesis was slower and less consistent than with an anatomical limb during a reaching and grasping task. This highlights the need for improved training principles for individuals with amputations and therapists.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Rehabilitation Engineering
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Reaching and grasping are fundamental activities of daily living.
  • Understanding performance differences between anatomical and artificial limbs is crucial for rehabilitation.
  • Simulated prostheses offer a controlled model for studying limb movement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare performance on a reaching and grasping task using an anatomical limb versus a simulated artificial limb.
  • To identify differences in movement time and consistency between the two limb types.
  • To evaluate the utility of a simulated prosthesis as a research model.

Main Methods:

  • College-aged volunteers performed a reaching and grasping task involving a simulated prosthesis and their anatomical limb.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Task involved reaching for, grasping, and returning a dowel to a designated hole.
  • Movement times (mean and standard deviation) were analyzed using repeated-measures multivariate analyses of variance.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences in performance were observed between the anatomical and simulated artificial limbs.
    • Movement times were consistently slower with the simulated prosthesis.
    • Movement consistency, measured by standard deviation, was also reduced with the prosthesis.

    Conclusions:

    • The simulated prosthesis demonstrated slower and less consistent performance compared to the anatomical limb.
    • Findings support the use of simulated prostheses in research for understanding movement control and acquisition.
    • Results emphasize the need for developing effective training strategies for individuals with amputations and their therapists.