Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The four-layer bandage system from a nursing perspective.

J Walsh1

  • 1Stockport Healthcare NHS Trust, Adswood Clinic, Stockport.

British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
|July 20, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Nurses found kit A (System 4) significantly easier to apply than kit B (Charing Cross) in a UK study comparing four-layer bandage systems. Kit A also showed better conformability, with overall preferences favoring kit A for both application and wear.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of branching fractions and mass spectra of B-->Kpipigamma.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

Measurement of the pseudoscalar decay constant fDs using charm-tagged events in e+e- collisions at square root s=10.58 GeV.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

CD4 cell count and initiation of antiretroviral therapy: trends in seven UK centres, 1997-2003.

HIV medicine·2007
Same author

Observation of a Charmed Baryon Decaying to D;{0}p at a Mass Near 2.94 GeV/c;{2}.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

Observation of decays B0-->Ds(*)+ pi- and B0-->Ds(*)- K+.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

Isolation facilities for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): how adequate are they?

The Journal of hospital infection·2007

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Medical Devices
  • Wound Care

Background:

  • Four-layer bandage systems are crucial in managing venous leg ulcers.
  • Nurses' perspectives on bandage usability are vital for effective patient care.
  • Existing systems include System 4, Charing Cross, and Profore.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare nurses' opinions on three distinct four-layer bandage systems.
  • To assess ease of application, conformability, comfort, and preferred length.
  • To determine overall nurse preference between the evaluated bandage kits.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative evaluation involving 57 pairs of nurses (appliers and wearers) across 20 UK health settings.
  • Nurses completed questionnaires on their experience with kit A (System 4), kit B (Charing Cross), and kit C (Profore).
  • Statistical analysis included frequency counts, means, standard errors, Fisher's exact test, and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Main Results:

  • Kit A was significantly easier to apply than kit B for layers 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P < 0.01 respectively).
  • Layer 1 of kit A demonstrated significantly better conformability than kit B (P < 0.001).
  • No significant differences were found in comfort across all kits; overall preferences favored kit A.

Conclusions:

  • Kit A (System 4) offers superior ease of application and conformability compared to kit B (Charing Cross).
  • Nurses expressed a preference for kit A, indicating its potential for improved clinical practice.
  • Further research could explore long-term outcomes and patient-reported comfort in more detail.

Related Experiment Videos