Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Graded Potential01:19

Graded Potential

Graded potentials are localized fluctuations in the cell membrane's electrical charge, commonly found in the dendrites of neurons. The magnitude of these potential changes depends on the strength of the initiating stimulus. In a membrane at its resting potential, a graded potential signifies a voltage shift either above -70 mV or below -70 mV.
Graded potentials fall into two categories: depolarizing and hyperpolarizing. Depolarizing graded potentials typically occur when sodium (Na+) or calcium...
Integration of Synaptic Events01:28

Integration of Synaptic Events

Synaptic integration mainly includes the summation of graded potentials. Graded potentials, regardless of their type, cause subtle alterations in membrane voltage, resulting in either depolarization or hyperpolarization. These incremental changes, when combined or summed, can propel the neuron toward its threshold. Consider, for example, a membrane experiencing a +15 mV shift, causing it to depolarize from -70 mV to -55 mV. In this scenario, graded potentials govern the membrane's ability to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smooth pursuit eye movements to isoluminant targets.

Journal of neurophysiology·2008
Same author

Loose-patch-juxtacellular recording in vivo--a method for functional characterization and labeling of neurons in macaque V1.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2006
Same author

Dynamics of spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2002
Same author

Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque V1.

Journal of neurophysiology·2002
Same author

Pursuit eye movements to second-order motion targets.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2001
Same author

How simple cells are made in a nonlinear network model of the visual cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

M P Sceniak1, D L Ringach, M J Hawken

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Pl., New York, New York 10003, USA. sceniak@cns.nyu.edu

Nature Neuroscience
|July 21, 1999
PubMed
Summary

The size of a neuron's receptive field in the primary visual cortex (V1) is not fixed. It expands at low contrast, revealing adaptive spatial summation in V1 neurons.

More Related Videos

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Neural interactions outside a primary visual cortical (V1) neuron's receptive field are known.
  • Previous studies assumed a fixed receptive field size, independent of stimulus characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the spatial summation extent in V1 neurons is fixed or adapts to stimulus properties.
  • To determine the impact of stimulus contrast on receptive field size.

Main Methods:

  • Electrophysiological recordings from V1 neurons in macaques.
  • Stimulation outside the classical receptive field with varying contrast levels.
  • Analysis of spatial summation extent and its dependence on contrast.

Main Results:

  • The extent of spatial summation in V1 neurons significantly depends on stimulus contrast.
  • Spatial summation was, on average, 2.3-fold greater at low contrast compared to high contrast.
  • This adaptive increase in spatial summation at low contrast was observed across V1 and was not influenced by surround inhibition.

Conclusions:

  • The classical receptive field size is not fixed but dynamically adapts to stimulus contrast.
  • Low contrast stimuli elicit a larger spatial summation, suggesting an adaptive mechanism in V1.
  • These findings challenge the traditional view of a static receptive field and highlight context-dependent neural processing in the visual cortex.