Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Planned orphanhood.

R Landau1

  • 1Paul Baerwald School of Social Work, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. mslanda@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|July 22, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-reported postoperative pain and stigmatizing language in anesthesia notes: a cross-sectional study (2017-2019).

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Nurse workforce diversity and use of neuraxial labor analgesia in the United States.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Management of pregnant patients with substance use disorder.

BJA education·2025
Same author

Intrathecal dexmedetomidine for cesarean delivery: a scoping review.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

A letter in response to "In Response to Discrimination, racism, and bias in childbirth pain management in the United States: a scoping review and directions for research and clinical care".

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Discrimination, racism, and bias in childbirth pain management in the United States: a scoping review and directions for research and clinical care.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same journal

The gendered burden of natural disasters: Evidence from two catastrophic earthquakes in Türkiye.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Epidemiologic approaches to policy research - examinations of single policies, policy clusters, and policy climates: Conceptualization, measurement, and analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Time to check up: Retirement and cancer screening in Australia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

When the platform becomes a co-author: Self-writing about HPV vaccination on social media as technologies of the self.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Erratum to "Defensive decoupling: Tensions and contradictions in a US surgical safety intervention" [Soc. Sci. Med. 403 (2026) 119421].

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Eating disorder severity and treatment outcome across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status: Intersectional inequities in a clinical sample.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

Planned orphanhood, enabled by medical technology allowing posthumous conception, raises significant ethical and judicial concerns. This paper argues against planned orphanhood to uphold human dignity, welfare, and justice for all involved.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive medicine and bioethics
  • Medical technology and its societal implications

Background:

  • Advancements in medical technology now permit conception and birth after an individual's death.
  • This capability introduces the concept of planned orphanhood, where a child is conceived posthumously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the psycho-social, ethical, and judicial dimensions of planned orphanhood.
  • To analyze the implications for the child, family, and society.
  • To advocate for a public discourse on the ethical permissibility of planned orphanhood.

Main Methods:

  • Review of medical innovations in human conception.
  • Analysis of psycho-social factors influencing the desire for posthumous children.
  • Examination of ethical dilemmas and judicial precedents, particularly in Israel.
Keywords:
Genetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Planned orphanhood presents complex ethical questions regarding parental responsibility, societal obligations, and the rights of the conceived child.
  • Judicial perspectives highlight the need to balance principles of human dignity, welfare, and justice.
  • The study identifies potential violations of human dignity and liberty for both the individuals involved and the posthumously conceived child.

Conclusions:

  • The paper argues for discouraging planned orphanhood due to potential infringements on fundamental ethical principles.
  • It emphasizes the need for comprehensive public discussion to address the multifaceted implications of this reproductive technology.
  • Upholding human dignity, welfare, and justice should guide societal and legal responses to planned orphanhood.