Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

K-space sampling strategies.

J Hennig1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Section of Medical Physics, University Clinic of Freiburg, Hugstetterstrasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.

European Radiology
|July 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Subsolar-Mass Binaries in the First Half of Advanced LIGO's and Advanced Virgo's Third Observing Run.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO-Virgo Observing Run.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA.

Living reviews in relativity·2020
Same author

GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with a Total Mass of 150  M_{⊙}.

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914.

Classical and quantum gravity·2020
Same author

GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO.

Physical review. D. (2016)·2020
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Temporal bone remodeling after venous stenting for pulsatile tinnitus: isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Do hepatic and biliary functional data from gadoxetate-enhanced MRI add value in predicting outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)?

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular risk factors and carotid plaque components in a multi-ethnic cohort using 3 Tesla MRI: the HELIUS study.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of lung imaging at 0.55T for assessment of interstitial lung disease in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

Understanding k-space sampling is key for MRI sequences. This method aids in classifying imaging properties and understanding limitations like signal-to-noise ratio for faster imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Image Reconstruction
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • K-space is fundamental to MRI, containing raw data that forms images.
  • Understanding k-space properties is crucial for optimizing MRI sequences and interpreting image quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the basic concepts and properties of k-space relevant to MRI.
  • To discuss the impact of k-space sampling on various MRI sequences and their artifacts.
  • To provide insight into sequence limitations regarding speed, SNR, distortion, resolution, and contrast.

Main Methods:

  • Description of k-space concepts and properties.
  • Analysis of k-space sampling in rectilinear (gradient-echo, EPI, spin echo, RARE) and non-rectilinear (spiral) sequences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of artifact behavior specific to different sampling methods.

    • Main Results:

    • K-space sampling directly influences signal-to-noise ratio, image distortion, resolution, and contrast.
    • Non-rectilinear sampling (e.g., spiral imaging) produces more complex artifacts than rectilinear scans.
    • The primary limitation to increasing imaging speed is the inherent loss of signal-to-noise ratio.

    Conclusions:

    • A thorough understanding of k-space sampling provides critical insights into MRI sequence performance.
    • Knowledge of k-space aids in predicting and managing artifacts and optimizing image quality.
    • Signal-to-noise ratio is the fundamental constraint for achieving faster MRI acquisition speeds.