Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Model of human refractive error development.

G K Hung1, K J Ciuffreda

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8014, USA. shoane@rci.rutgers.edu

Current Eye Research
|July 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial frequency discrimination in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Elevated dark adaptation thresholds in traumatic brain injury.

Brain injury·2005
Same author

Effect of cumulative nearwork on accommodative facility and asthenopia.

International ophthalmology·2003
Same author

Fixational ocular motor control is plastic despite visual deprivation.

Visual neuroscience·2003
Same author

Differential retinal-defocus magnitude during eye growth provides the appropriate direction signal.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research·2001
Same author

A unifying theory of refractive error development.

Bulletin of mathematical biology·2000
Same journal

Apolipoprotein C3 Promotes Retinal Angiogenesis via the MYC Pathway in Hypoxia.

Current eye research·2026
Same journal

Possible Causal Association Between Thyroid-Related Traits and Diabetic Retinopathy Risk: Evidence From 23 Medication-Taking Traits.

Current eye research·2026
Same journal

Linking Microstructure to Mechanics in ICG-Stained Lens Capsules: Insights from Nanoindentation to Electron Microscopy.

Current eye research·2026
Same journal

Corneal Sensitivity, Sub-Basal Corneal Nerve Plexus, and Tear Neuropeptides in Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Visual Display Terminal Users.

Current eye research·2026
Same journal

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Mitigates Dexamethasone-Induced Myofibroblast-Like Transformation and Dysfunction in Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells.

Current eye research·2026
Same journal

Usefulness of the Entropy of the Bayesian Posterior Distribution of the Threshold to Assess the Reliability of Measured Visual Field.

Current eye research·2026
See all related articles

This study models refractive error development, showing genetic and environmental factors like nearwork influence hyperopia, emmetropia, and myopia progression over 30 years. The model highlights differing susceptibilities to defocus across refractive groups.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Computational Biology
  • Developmental Biology

Background:

  • Refractive error development is complex, influenced by genetic and environmental factors.
  • Understanding the distinct pathways in hyperopes, emmetropes, and early/late-onset myopes is crucial.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the interactive mechanisms and time courses of refractive error progression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct a computational model simulating refractive error development over 30 years.
  • To differentiate refractive error mechanisms in hyperopes (HYP), emmetropes (EMM), early-onset myopes (EOM), and late-onset myopes (LOM).
  • To investigate the interplay of genetic and environmental factors in refractive error progression.

Main Methods:

  • A nearwork-induced transient myopia (NITM) model was adapted and extended.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporated genetically-controlled axial growth and environmentally-controlled defocus-induced axial elongation.
  • Simulations quantified refractive error development based on accommodative error (AErms) and defocus thresholds over 30 years.

    • Main Results:

    • All groups initiated with genetically-determined hyperopic refractive error.
    • Hyperopes (HYP) showed highest defocus threshold, remaining hyperopic.
    • Emmetropes (EMM) shifted to emmetropia within 2 years.
    • Early-onset myopes (EOM) showed genetic and late-onset (15 yrs) defocus influence; late-onset myopes (LOM) showed only late-onset defocus influence.
    • Emmetropization occurred for induced refractive errors < 0.5 D.

    Conclusions:

    • Both genetic predisposition and environmental defocus significantly contribute to refractive error development.
    • The model provides a quantitative framework for analyzing refractive error and emmetropization processes.
    • Differential susceptibility to defocus is key in distinguishing refractive error trajectories.