Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patients' complaints about medical practice.

A E Daniel1, R J Burn, S Horarik

  • 1School of Sociology, University of New South Wales, Sydney. a.daniel@unsw.edu.au

The Medical Journal of Australia
|July 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study looked at the experiences of people who filed complaints about medical treatment in New South Wales. It found that most complaints were about clinical care or poor communication. The majority of complainants were women, and many filed on behalf of others. Most incidents happened in doctors' offices, and most involved male general practitioners. Many complainants were dissatisfied with the outcome and wanted stronger actions, like punishment or acknowledgment of harm. Few sought compensation. The findings suggest that current complaint processes may not meet patient expectations and could be improved.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental illness and the law.

Australian family physician·2006
Same author

Immunisation--lifting our game.

The Medical journal of Australia·1998
Same author

Intraocular pressure in leprosy patients without clinically apparent anterior segment pathology.

Indian journal of leprosy·1994
Same author

Family violence: impact on children.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·1992
Same author

Lifetime and six-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders among sentenced female offenders.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1988
Same author

Conduct disordered adolescents from a community sample.

Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1987

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality and patient safety
  • Medical ethics and professional conduct
  • Public health policy and regulation

Background:

Understanding patient complaints is essential for improving healthcare delivery and trust. Prior research has shown that complaints often focus on communication issues or perceived negligence. However, the specific emotional and procedural outcomes of lodging a complaint remain unclear. This gap motivated researchers to explore the experiences of individuals who filed complaints. No prior work had resolved how satisfaction or dissatisfaction affects future patient behavior. The study aimed to clarify these dynamics. It also examined the types of incidents and the demographics of those involved. This context sets the stage for analyzing complaint resolution processes.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to assess the experiences of individuals who filed medical complaints and the outcomes of those complaints. Researchers wanted to understand the nature of the incidents, the emotions involved, and the satisfaction with the resolution process. The motivation came from the need to improve complaint-handling systems. They also sought to identify patterns in complaint types and outcomes. The study focused on finalised complaints from a specific timeframe. It included data on the complainants, the doctors involved, and the resolution status. The goal was to inform healthcare policy and practice. This approach allowed for a comprehensive analysis of the complaint process.

Keywords:
medical complaintshealthcare resolutionpatient satisfactioncomplaint handlingdoctor-patient communication

Frequently Asked Questions

The most common complaints were about clinical care (64%), followed by rudeness or poor communication (22%) and unethical behavior (14%).

Seventy percent of the complainants were women, and 44% filed complaints on behalf of someone else.

More than half of the incidents occurred in doctors' consulting rooms, according to the study data.

Eighty-seven percent of the doctors involved in complaints were men, and over half were general practitioners.

Most complainants were dissatisfied with the outcome, and a quarter considered legal action, though 70% planned no further steps.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

Researchers conducted a random sample survey using a 32-item questionnaire. The survey was sent to 500 complainants by the New South Wales Health Care Complaints Commission. Participants returned the forms reply-paid to a university. The study included 290 individuals with finalised complaints between February 1996 and August 1997. Data collected included demographic information, incident details, and emotional responses. The questionnaire assessed the type and location of incidents. It also measured satisfaction with the outcome and intentions for further action. The response rate was 63%, with 314 completed surveys. Non-medical complaints were excluded from the analysis.

Main Results:

Of the 290 complaints analyzed, 64% were about clinical care, 22% about rudeness or poor communication, and 14% about unethical behavior. Seventy percent of complainants were women, and 44% filed on behalf of others. Most incidents occurred in doctors' consulting rooms. Eighty-seven percent of the involved doctors were men, and over half were general practitioners. Thirty-seven percent of complaints were dismissed, and 21% had unknown outcomes. Forty percent believed the doctor was disciplined. Most complainants were dissatisfied with the resolution. A quarter considered legal action, but 70% planned no further steps. Nearly all said they would avoid the doctor again. Respondents wanted stronger measures, such as punishment or acknowledgment of harm.

Conclusions:

The study found that most complainants were dissatisfied with the outcome of their complaints. They typically wanted stronger actions, such as punishment or acknowledgment of harm. Only a few sought compensation. The majority of incidents occurred in doctors' offices, and most involved male general practitioners. Complainants often filed on behalf of others. The findings suggest that current complaint resolution processes may not meet patient expectations. The authors propose that improving transparency and accountability could enhance satisfaction. They also suggest that addressing communication and ethical issues is crucial. These conclusions align with the data presented in the abstract.

Complainants generally wanted stronger measures, such as punishment or acknowledgment of harm, rather than compensation.