Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Vowel-specific effects in concurrent vowel identification.

A de Cheveigné¹

¹Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle, CNRS/Université Paris 7, France. cheveign@ircam.fr

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|July 27, 1999

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A model of the perceptual asymmetry between peaks and troughs of frequency modulation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2000

Same author

Waveform interactions and the segregation of concurrent vowels.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999

Same author

Pitch shifts of mistuned partials: a time-domain model.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999

Same author

Missing-data model of vowel identification.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999

Same author

Cancellation model of pitch perception.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1998

Same author

Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: a test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1995

Same journal

Reducing computational complexity in adaptive sound zones with online room impulse response estimation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same journal

Small-sample unbiased linear coherence estimators for a complex Gaussian random process.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same journal

Automated detection and annotation of toothed-whale whistles using transformer-based instance segmentation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same journal

Effect of temperature and concentration on the thermo-acoustic behavior of vitamin B5 (d-Panthenol) solutions in the presence of glycol additives.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same journal

The visome: Using cognitive networks to examine lip-reading errors in English words.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same journal

Resident subjective annoyance responses to combined road traffic and train-induced structure-borne noise: Effects of sound environment.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

See all related articles

A difference in fundamental frequency (F0) aids in distinguishing concurrent vowels, even when one is significantly quieter. However, large differences in amplitude ratio cannot be overcome by increased F0 differences.

Area of Science:

Auditory Perception
Acoustic Phonetics
Psychoacoustics

Background:

Identifying concurrent sounds is crucial for auditory scene analysis.
Fundamental frequency (F0) differences are hypothesized to aid in sound segregation.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how amplitude ratio and fundamental frequency difference (delta F0) affect the identification of concurrent synthetic vowels.
To understand the role of spectral cues and F0-guided segregation mechanisms.

Main Methods:

Synthetic vowel pairs were presented with varying amplitude ratios (-35 to 35 dB) and delta F0 (0% to 12%).
Listener identification performance was measured under different acoustic conditions.
Spectral analysis was used to identify key cues for vowel identification.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Vowels 25 dB weaker than their competitor were identifiable with a delta F0.
Vowels 35 dB weaker were not identifiable.
Larger delta F0 did not compensate for unfavorable amplitude ratios.
delta F0 enhanced target vowel cues, even when the target spectrum was 10 dB below the competitor.

Conclusions:

F0-guided segregation can enhance the prominence of a target vowel's spectral cues.
Identification is possible when formant cues (F1, F2) are prominent, despite competitor cues.
Results challenge models based solely on harmonic enhancement, beats, or channel selection for F0-guided segregation.