Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning.

A S Elstein1

  • 1Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago 60612-7309, USA. aelstein@uic.edu

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|August 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Clinical decisions often involve uncertainty. This study explains common reasoning errors using Bayes

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical ethical dilemmas: convergent and divergent views of two scholarly communities.

Journal of medical ethics·2006
Same author

On the origins and development of evidence-based medicine and medical decision making.

Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]·2004
Same author

Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery.

Annals of surgery·2001
Same author

Evidence-based morning report for inpatient pediatrics rotations.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2000
Same author

Clinical problem solving and decision psychology: comment on "the epistemology of clinical reasoning".

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2000
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of universal compared with voluntary screening for human immunodeficiency virus among pregnant women in Chicago.

Pediatrics·2000

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Clinical Reasoning

Background:

  • Clinical decisions are frequently made under conditions of uncertainty regarding diagnosis or treatment outcomes.
  • Accurate diagnosis and effective treatment selection are critical in healthcare, yet are often challenged by incomplete information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain common errors in clinical reasoning by applying normative models from statistical decision theory.
  • To illustrate how cognitive heuristics and biases impact clinical judgment and decision-making processes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Bayes' theorem to model the process of updating diagnostic opinions with new data.
  • Applying principles of decision theory, specifically maximizing expected value, to treatment choices.
  • Comparing observed clinical judgments against established normative models.

Main Results:

  • Bayes' theorem provides a formal framework for diagnostic reasoning under uncertainty.
  • Decision theory offers a model for optimizing treatment selection based on expected outcomes.
  • Cognitive heuristics and biases systematically lead to deviations from normative decision-making in clinical practice.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding cognitive biases is crucial for improving clinical judgment and decision-making.
  • Normative models like Bayes' theorem and decision theory can identify and explain errors in clinical reasoning.
  • Addressing heuristics and biases can lead to more rational and effective clinical choices.

Related Experiment Videos